Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Why not Fred Davis for Gaither?

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-10-2010, 03:45 PM   #1
TheBackupKicker
Camp Scrub
 
TheBackupKicker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 54
Re: Why not Fred Davis for Gaither?

no no no we need to keep both of our tight ends to run 2 TE sets and what about an injury like last season? we need the depth

i would take okung over gaither anyways
__________________
Trade for Brandon Marshall

B Marshall stats the last 3 seasons
2009- 101 catches 1120 yards
2008- 104 catches 1265 yards
2007- 102 catches 1325 yards

LETS GO CAPS
TheBackupKicker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2010, 03:50 PM   #2
Pocket$ $traight
Registered User
 
Pocket$ $traight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fairfax, VA
Age: 50
Posts: 4,261
Re: Why not Fred Davis for Gaither?

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBackupKicker View Post
no no no we need to keep both of our tight ends to run 2 TE sets and what about an injury like last season? we need the depth

i would take okung over gaither anyways

How can you be so certain that you would rather have Okung. As good as he was until he hits the field he is a ?.

Acording to the site that 30 gut posted, Gaither was the #6 tackle in the league last year. I don't care how good Okung is, there is almost zero chance that a rookie could be that succesful.

I would rather have both of them!
Pocket$ $traight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2010, 03:54 PM   #3
TheBackupKicker
Camp Scrub
 
TheBackupKicker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 54
Re: Why not Fred Davis for Gaither?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pocket$ $traight View Post
How can you be so certain that you would rather have Okung. As good as he was until he hits the field he is a ?.

Acording to the site that 30 gut posted, Gaither was the #6 tackle in the league last year. I don't care how good Okung is, there is almost zero chance that a rookie could be that succesful.

I would rather have both of them!
okung is the most sure thing in this draft but having Gaither at RT and Okung at LT would give us the best tackles in the league
__________________
Trade for Brandon Marshall

B Marshall stats the last 3 seasons
2009- 101 catches 1120 yards
2008- 104 catches 1265 yards
2007- 102 catches 1325 yards

LETS GO CAPS
TheBackupKicker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2010, 01:25 AM   #4
tryfuhl
Gamebreaker
 
tryfuhl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 43
Posts: 12,514
Re: Why not Fred Davis for Gaither?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pocket$ $traight View Post
How can you be so certain that you would rather have Okung. As good as he was until he hits the field he is a ?.

Acording to the site that 30 gut posted, Gaither was the #6 tackle in the league last year. I don't care how good Okung is, there is almost zero chance that a rookie could be that succesful.

I would rather have both of them!
And what would make someone think that Gaither would fit here very well?
tryfuhl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2010, 02:47 AM   #5
Counter-Tre
Special Teams
 
Counter-Tre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Venice Beach, CA
Age: 54
Posts: 347
Re: Why not Fred Davis for Gaither?

Why is everyone so capricious about getting rid of Cooley? Blasphemous motherfuckers the whole lot of you. Float Haynesworth to a team with a 4-3 for a pick or an o-lineman and cease to let the words "trade" and "Cooley" ever pollute yer filthy pie-holes again.
Counter-Tre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2010, 03:25 AM   #6
wilsowilso
Registered User
 
wilsowilso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Age: 53
Posts: 2,841
Re: Why not Fred Davis for Gaither?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Counter-Tre View Post
Why is everyone so capricious about getting rid of Cooley? Blasphemous motherfuckers the whole lot of you. Float Haynesworth to a team with a 4-3 for a pick or an o-lineman and cease to let the words "trade" and "Cooley" ever pollute yer filthy pie-holes again.
This is my favorite post of the week.

So good.
wilsowilso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2010, 08:25 AM   #7
Pocket$ $traight
Registered User
 
Pocket$ $traight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fairfax, VA
Age: 50
Posts: 4,261
Re: Why not Fred Davis for Gaither?

Quote:
Originally Posted by tryfuhl View Post
And what would make someone think that Gaither would fit here very well?

He seems to be in the Dockery and M. Williams mold.
Pocket$ $traight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2010, 07:04 AM   #8
44Deezel
The Starter
 
44Deezel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Davidsonville
Posts: 1,783
Re: Why not Fred Davis for Gaither?

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBackupKicker View Post
no no no we need to keep both of our tight ends to run 2 TE sets and what about an injury like last season? we need the depth

i would take okung over gaither anyways
Ahh, the all-important 2 TE sets. Every Super Bowl winner the last 10 years won because of their impossible to defend 2 TE sets
44Deezel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2010, 07:50 AM   #9
Carnage
Special Teams
 
Carnage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 473
Re: Why not Fred Davis for Gaither?

Personally, I like for a team to have two offensive tackles.
Carnage is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.91132 seconds with 11 queries