Why Jason Campbell should stay in DC.

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by BigHairedAristocrat

so smoot, a few questions for the rumor-starved:

1) when will he be traded?
2) who are currently the most likely partners (we've heard 5 teams mentioned before)?
3) what are we likely go accept for him?

1. I'm guessing my day 2 of the draft at the latest
2. Bills, Raiders, Jaguars, Panthers (in that order)
3. Between a 3rd and 5th (or some combination)

[BigHairedAristocrat]

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

1. I'm guessing my day 2 of the draft at the latest
2. Bills, Raiders, Jaguars, Panthers (in that order)
3. Between a 3rd and 5th (or some combination)

thanks for the info. Raiders would definitely be the best deal for us, as their picks are higher. Panthers would probably be the best opportunity for Campbell.

[Beneil (diehard since 87)]

Originally Posted by BigHairedAristocrat

thanks for the info. Raiders would definitely be the best deal for us, as their picks are higher. Panthers would probably be the best opportunity for Campbell.

Best opportunity!? it's the same situation. Good running game, below average line, only one good receiver.

[BigHairedAristocrat]

Originally Posted by Beneil (diehard since 87)

Best opportunity!? it's the same situation. Good running game, below average line, only one good receiver.

horrible, meddling owner. horrible head coach. that may have accurately described the 2008 and 2009 redskins, but its no longer the case here. i'm pretty sure no one will trade anything of value for campbell unless that team gets a reasonable assurance from campbell that he'd sign an extension with the team. no way campbell does that with oakland.

[RedTempleSkin]

Originally Posted by Beneil (diehard since 87)

Best opportunity!? it's the same situation. Good running game, below average line, only one good receiver.

That would not be the case, Panthers have a line that I wish we have. The running game has to be one of the top 3 in football. They do however have only one receiver.