Income falls 3.2% during Obama's term thus far

[firstdown]

Originally Posted by Schneed10

First, on auto bail-outs, no I don't think that has any meaningful long-term impact on the performance of American companies. In the end that only affected a few companies, a drop in the bucket compared to the stock market overall.

One could make the argument that without bailing out the banks, we would have entered a gigantic depression due to frozen lending. That particular bailout action had to be taken, or businesses nationwide would have lost the access to capital and hence lost the ability to invest and grow their businesses. Our whole economy could have ground to a halt.

Now, one could also say that the bank bailout caused us to drive up our national debt, which pushes down the value of the dollar, which makes our imports more expensive, which costs American companies over the long run. So maybe the bank bailout affected the stock market outlook, taking it from a 6.75% expected return to a 6.5%. That would be a reasonable assertion.

But nothing an administration does can cause stocks to gain ground during one period of time vs lose ground during another. Policies, especially those of the Fed, can swing stocks maybe 1% up or down, but as you know the stock market makes much larger swings from week to week and year to year than just 1% here and there. Economic conditions are what drive the ups and downs of the stock market.

We pretty much agree on this I was just syaing goverment policy does impact the stock market but should have been clear on how much impact.

[Schneed10]

Originally Posted by firstdown

We pretty much agree on this I was just syaing goverment policy does impact the stock market but should have been clear on how much impact.

Fair enough. I definitely shouldn't be absolute in my statements. It can have some effect for sure, just not nearly enough to justify drawing conclusions from those ridiculous graphs posted earlier in the thread.