![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
| View Poll Results: Grade the pick of Trent Williams | |||
| A |
|
102 | 57.95% |
| B |
|
60 | 34.09% |
| C |
|
9 | 5.11% |
| D |
|
2 | 1.14% |
| F |
|
3 | 1.70% |
| Voters: 176. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 4,153
|
Re: The Official 2010 NFL Draft Thread: Round 1
Don't be so sure he is wrong. Not agreeing with him either now, but don't do the typical new regime can't do any wrong crap. Too many folks cream their pants whenever we have landed a new coach with a new scheme. Thus far the new FO isn't that much different from the last FO. Trading picks for FAs, signing FAs on the downward slope of their careers etc. McNabb was a gutsy move, but anyone that questions it isn't a total loon either. Donovan had a decent line and probably one of the best, if not the best WR trio in the NFL with Jackson, Maclin, and Avante, and still couldn't get the job done. Donovan is a definite upgrade over JC mind you, but that doesn't mean we are going to the promised land for sure with Donovan. He had more to work with in Philly and didn't get it done. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fairfax, VA
Age: 50
Posts: 4,261
|
Re: The Official 2010 NFL Draft Thread: Round 1
Quote:
You are right, I could be the wrong. Here is how I look at it. - Our coach was a GD effing idiot and we needed an upgrade - Done - Our GM was a GD effing idiot and we needed an upgrade - Done - We had a lot of underperforming overpaid players who needed to go - Done - Stephon Heyer could not be our left tackle and we need a tackle for the future - Done - We needed to upgrade QB - Done - Our RB has been coddled and needed to be pushed - Done Not one of these moves is an Archuletta type move. Every move by every FO is "questionable" but to question every move by two established NFL guys doesn't make sense. If they go 3-13 ok but he hasn't even given them a chance. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Naega jeil jal naga
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 40
Posts: 14,750
|
Re: The Official 2010 NFL Draft Thread: Round 1
I like this explanation better lol.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice." - Scooter "I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now." - FRPLG |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 4,153
|
Re: The Official 2010 NFL Draft Thread: Round 1
Quote:
I am with you Pocket, just saying don't always say the FO is infallible. Our pick was solid and overall I like what we did, but you have to expect mistakes or some situations not panning out. The best part of this FO, and so far the only real main difference is that they sign the big names for low money, but that is because the FAs in question have been deemed expendable. They have a plan I am sure, but it seems to be predicated on getting more picks trading JC and/or AH. I hope both are dealt with before tomorrow and we get 2-4 picks back. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|