![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,380
|
Re: Day 2, rds 2 & 3.
So if Bruce Campbell falls to us in the 4th round, do we take him?
__________________
R.I.P. #21 |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 681
|
Re: Day 2, rds 2 & 3.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | ||
|
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 43
Posts: 12,514
|
Re: Day 2, rds 2 & 3.
Quote:
Quote:
4th round RT possibility? sure why not? |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 4,153
|
Re: Day 2, rds 2 & 3.
Quote:
Hell yeah we do. Only way to salvage this draft, but that is if he is still available. My question is where is the change from the previous "regime" or way of doing things? WE gave up a 2nd for a QB that is great, but is not our franchise guy, a 5th for oft an injured FA defensive linemen, and we are stuck with a disgruntled DT and a QB nobody seems to want at the moment. We were better off resigning JC and keeping the picks for another OL and a LB. I really hope that Allen has a real plan in place and not going to only rely on hand me down FAs for his tenure here. The only difference thus far between the old and new regimes is that the new FO is smart not to sign huge ass contracts for these castoffs. I was hoping for a more fundamental change in tact. THe win now philosophy is good when you have some depth and a decent amount of talent, but we have neither depth or a huge talent pool outside of our stable of RBs and QBs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,202
|
Re: Day 2, rds 2 & 3.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|