Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Did We Shoot Ourselves In The Foot??

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-07-2005, 02:08 PM   #1
skinsguy
Pro Bowl
 
skinsguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
Re: Did We Shoot Ourselves In The Foot??

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrudLee
If Coles doesn't demand his release two years into a seven year deal, this doesn't happen. There are plenty of good reasons to criticize the Front Office - this ain't one of them.

EXACTLY! Coles authored this...neither the front office nor Joe Gibbs wanted Coles to leave. The only one who wanted him to leave was Coles himself. What are we supposed to do? Keep Coles against his will?
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!"
skinsguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2005, 02:17 PM   #2
Tahoe Skin
Special Teams
 
Tahoe Skin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 100
Re: Did We Shoot Ourselves In The Foot??

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsguy
EXACTLY! Coles authored this...neither the front office nor Joe Gibbs wanted Coles to leave. The only one who wanted him to leave was Coles himself. What are we supposed to do? Keep Coles against his will?
You just don't let the mutineers run the ship!

And if we did want to let him have what he wanted, why didn't we insist on renegotiating his contract to lessen the hit?

Just hard to figure.
Tahoe Skin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2005, 02:39 PM   #3
MTK
Hail Raiser
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,121
Re: Did We Shoot Ourselves In The Foot??

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tahoe Skin
You just don't let the mutineers run the ship!

And if we did want to let him have what he wanted, why didn't we insist on renegotiating his contract to lessen the hit?

Just hard to figure.
So you'd rather keep an unhappy player around and let him potentially become a locker room distraction down the road, if he isn't already?

Some players have already voiced their opinion that if a player doesn't want to be here he should leave. Those players that feel that way probably wouldn't be likely to warm up to Coles after this mess and it would just simmer in the back of their minds.

Nobody wants to go into battle with someone who isn't playing for the right reasons.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2005, 02:59 PM   #4
Tahoe Skin
Special Teams
 
Tahoe Skin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 100
Re: Did We Shoot Ourselves In The Foot??

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72
So you'd rather keep an unhappy player around and let him potentially become a locker room distraction down the road, if he isn't already?

Some players have already voiced their opinion that if a player doesn't want to be here he should leave. Those players that feel that way probably wouldn't be likely to warm up to Coles after this mess and it would just simmer in the back of their minds.

Nobody wants to go into battle with someone who isn't playing for the right reasons.
Yes, rather than screw up my ability to sign 2, 3 or 4 other quality players, I would rather keep an unhappy player around and let him potentially become a locker room distraction down the road.

Winning changes player attitudes!

And players can police themselves.

I would even lock him out if it got bad, rather than screw up my cap space.
Tahoe Skin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2005, 03:11 PM   #5
Redskins_P
Fight for old DC!
 
Redskins_P's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Aldie, VA
Age: 48
Posts: 4,101
Re: Did We Shoot Ourselves In The Foot??

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tahoe Skin
Yes, rather than screw up my ability to sign 2, 3 or 4 other quality players, I would rather keep an unhappy player around and let him potentially become a locker room distraction down the road.

Winning changes player attitudes!

And players can police themselves.

I would even lock him out if it got bad, rather than screw up my cap space.

What other 2, 3 or 4 players were we going to sign? It's not like we were going on a FA shopping spree.
Redskins_P is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2005, 03:17 PM   #6
MTK
Hail Raiser
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,121
Re: Did We Shoot Ourselves In The Foot??

Quote:
Originally Posted by Redskins_P
What other 2, 3 or 4 players were we going to sign? It's not like we were going on a FA shopping spree.
bingo
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2005, 03:58 PM   #7
Tahoe Skin
Special Teams
 
Tahoe Skin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 100
Re: Did We Shoot Ourselves In The Foot??

Quote:
Originally Posted by Redskins_P
What other 2, 3 or 4 players were we going to sign? It's not like we were going on a FA shopping spree.
Perhaps we're not going on a spending spree cause we now have $9 million LESS to do so because of the Coles trade. I can think of several people we could have gotten, beginning with one named Fred Smoot.
Tahoe Skin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2005, 04:04 PM   #8
Redskins_P
Fight for old DC!
 
Redskins_P's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Aldie, VA
Age: 48
Posts: 4,101
Re: Did We Shoot Ourselves In The Foot??

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tahoe Skin
Perhaps we're not going on a spending spree cause we now have $9 million LESS to do so because of the Coles trade. I can think of several people we could have gotten, beginning with one named Fred Smoot.

We weren't going on spending spree anyway (read the Washtimes article titled "Skins done in Free agency") even before the Coles trade. And as for Smoot, we made our offer, and we weren't going to budge (read the WPost).

I really don't know why you think we were better off keeping a guy who doesn't want to be here. Sometimes you gotta bite the bullet and cut your losses. Coach Gibbs has said over and over again that he wants players who want to be "real Redskins". Coles doesn't fit that criteria.
Redskins_P is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 2.16786 seconds with 11 queries