Joey Galloway signed

Ruhskins · 04-29-2010, 12:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

Are we official media now? If so I would like my comments stricken from the record.

Yes we are, I'm actually looking to hold a press conference in the future whenever I decide to end the Avatar Mutiny. LOL.

celts32 · 04-29-2010, 02:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SolidSnake84

Off the record, I think its a shame that a talented NFL receiver like Owens has let his personal ego get to the point where teams wont sign him because of it. If he wasn't such an ass he'd have any team in the NFL begging him to sign with them...

TO is no longer the player that you are describing here. He started slowing down a couple years ago towards the end in Dallas. His production is no longer worth the risk of what he can bring into your locker room. I am not sure he will find any team to sign him.

SmootSmack · 04-29-2010, 02:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by celts32

TO is no longer the player that you are describing here. He started slowing down a couple years ago towards the end in Dallas. His production is no longer worth the risk of what he can bring into your locker room. I am not sure he will find any team to sign him.

He's still putting up some pretty damn good numbers

44ever · 04-29-2010, 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

He's still putting up some pretty damn good numbers

Thank You!

celts32 · 04-29-2010, 02:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

He's still putting up some pretty damn good numbers

I don't know...55 receptions for 800+ yards. That's pretty good for a guy with no baggage I guess. But for me to put up with him and his media circus I want the 1200 yards and 15 TD's that he used to produce.

44ever · 04-29-2010, 03:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by celts32

I don't know...55 receptions for 800+ yards. That's pretty good for a guy with no baggage I guess. But for me to put up with him and his media circus I want the 1200 yards and 15 TD's that he used to produce.

He is still gaining over 15 yards per rec. Thats as good as he ever was. He's still the same TO. Just get him the ball.
Terrell Owens: Career Stats

Rainy Parade · 04-29-2010, 02:44 PM

i think TO is okay for a team (other than the redskins) if he will sign for the minimum, or a very small/reasonable incentive-laden contract. incentives for performance and team success but also for behavior.

he was generally well-behaved in buffalo, as we all knew he would be on a 1-year deal, but unfortunately for him and his agent, that did not translate into an instant big-money contract. TO and Drew must realize by now that he must accept the terms i mentioned in the first paragraph. if he does that, he has the chance to possibly sign with a contender if one is willing to take him on. i would think a ring is more important than a payday, but i could be wrong. plus, his legacy/image etc would greatly improve if he won a ring (even if he joined the Colts/Pats/Saints/Vikes type team that was already good without him). and yes, improving his legacy would, in the long run, earn him a bit more money thru future endeavors.

MTK · 04-29-2010, 03:00 PM

Considering the QB situation in Buffalo last year those are very good numbers. In a good offense I think he's easily a 1000 yd guy again.

GTripp0012 · 04-29-2010, 08:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mattyk

Considering the QB situation in Buffalo last year those are very good numbers. In a good offense I think he's easily a 1000 yd guy again.

I think Owens showed in Buffalo that he can still play a little bit, but I'm skeptical that any team that needed to throw to Owens enough for him to rack up 1,000 yards could be a good offense.

Lee Evans saw fewer balls than Owens last year which is bad for producing points.

MTK · 04-29-2010, 09:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GTripp0012

I think Owens showed in Buffalo that he can still play a little bit, but I'm skeptical that any team that needed to throw to Owens enough for him to rack up 1,000 yards could be a good offense.

Lee Evans saw fewer balls than Owens last year which is bad for producing points.

AT 15 yards a pop all he needed was 11 more catches last year to reach 1000. I don't see why he wouldn't be good for 60+ catches on a good team.

GTripp0012 · 04-29-2010, 09:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mattyk

AT 15 yards a pop all he needed was 11 more catches last year to reach 1000. I don't see why he wouldn't be good for 60+ catches on a good team.

At 11 more catches, that's what, 20-23 more targets? That's putting him in the Brandon Marshall no-one-else-in-the-offense range.

Not that you couldn't throw him the ball 130-140 times in a season at age 36 to get him 60-70 catches, it's just that I would not.

Bigreds77 · 04-29-2010, 06:36 PM

Nice to see some Buckeyes are signing with the Skins.

jsarno · 04-29-2010, 09:02 PM

What a useless signing. Galloway will be 39 in November, and he has exactly 20 catches for 205 yards...........in TWO years! It would be a travesty to our youth movement if he is still here come first game.

MTK · 04-29-2010, 09:43 PM

How many targets did he have for his 55 catches?

GTripp0012 · 04-29-2010, 09:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mattyk

How many targets did he have for his 55 catches?

109. Actually down considerably from his Dallas days.

04-29-2010, 02:44 PM	#7
Rainy Parade Special Teams Join Date: Apr 2010 Posts: 269	Re: Joey Galloway signed i think TO is okay for a team (other than the redskins) if he will sign for the minimum, or a very small/reasonable incentive-laden contract. incentives for performance and team success but also for behavior. he was generally well-behaved in buffalo, as we all knew he would be on a 1-year deal, but unfortunately for him and his agent, that did not translate into an instant big-money contract. TO and Drew must realize by now that he must accept the terms i mentioned in the first paragraph. if he does that, he has the chance to possibly sign with a contender if one is willing to take him on. i would think a ring is more important than a payday, but i could be wrong. plus, his legacy/image etc would greatly improve if he won a ring (even if he joined the Colts/Pats/Saints/Vikes type team that was already good without him). and yes, improving his legacy would, in the long run, earn him a bit more money thru future endeavors. __________________ BUMS LOGIC all the muse unfit to print: original writings about music, film, tv. culture, humor, etc direct link to the stuff on BumsLogic.com written by me

04-29-2010, 03:00 PM	#8
MTK Hail Raiser Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 53 Posts: 100,038	Re: Joey Galloway signed Considering the QB situation in Buffalo last year those are very good numbers. In a good offense I think he's easily a 1000 yd guy again. __________________ Support The Warpath! \| Warpath Shop

04-29-2010, 06:36 PM	#12
Bigreds77 Special Teams Join Date: Nov 2008 Posts: 214	Re: Joey Galloway signed Nice to see some Buckeyes are signing with the Skins.

04-29-2010, 09:02 PM	#13
jsarno Franchise Player Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: 31 Spooner St. Age: 51 Posts: 9,534	Re: Joey Galloway signed What a useless signing. Galloway will be 39 in November, and he has exactly 20 catches for 205 yards...........in TWO years! It would be a travesty to our youth movement if he is still here come first game. __________________ Zoltan is ZESTY! - courtesy of joeredskin

04-29-2010, 09:43 PM	#14
MTK Hail Raiser Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 53 Posts: 100,038	Re: Joey Galloway signed How many targets did he have for his 55 catches? __________________ Support The Warpath! \| Warpath Shop

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Joey Galloway signed

Locker Room Main Forum