Looks like NYG first round pick is having some health issues...

[Dirtbag59]

Originally Posted by CultBrennan59

He had only 6.5 sacks this whole year

Keep in mind that this stat was achieved in only 7 games. I remember feeling the same way when I first heard the 6.5 sack number but after I heard that it was done in such a short amount of time it started to make a lot more sense. I mean if Michael Johnson the physical freak from Georgia Tech falls to the 3rd round with 9 sacks it would make little sense to see Pierre-Paul as a top 15 pick a year later considering the fact that both are physically in a class of their own.

NorthJersey.com: Giants take Jason Pierre-Paul of South Florida ...
Apr 23, 2010 ... South Florida's Jason Pierre-Paul runs a drill at the NFL football ... started seven games for South Florida, but was in on 45 tackles with 6½ sacks ....

I guess in the end D-Lineman taken by the Giants should warrant at least some degree of worry.

[CultBrennan59]

Originally Posted by Dirtbag359

Keep in mind that this stat was achieved in only 7 games. I remember feeling the same way when I first heard the 6.5 sack number but after I heard that it was done in such a short amount of time it started to make a lot more sense. I mean if Michael Johnson the physical freak from Georgia Tech falls to the 3rd round with 9 sacks it would make little sense to see Pierre-Paul as a top 15 pick a year later considering the fact that both are physically in a class of their own.



I guess in the end D-Lineman taken by the Giants should warrant at least some degree of worry.

Umm I think I should add that now, to my list before of reasons to like him less. If your telling me he started only 7 games, then that means the games he didn't start he was used off of the bench, as a situational pass rusher, which is also how he got some of his 6.5 sacks last year.

[Dirtbag59]

Originally Posted by CultBrennan59

Umm I think I should add that now, to my list before of reasons to like him less. If your telling me he started only 7 games, then that means the games he didn't start he was used off of the bench, as a situational pass rusher, which is also how he got some of his 6.5 sacks last year.

This is what scouts see though when they look at Pierre-Paul

After a slow start to 2009, Pierre-Paul broke out in a big way against Florida State with three TFLs, a sack, a forced fumble, and two hurries. He followed up the next week with two TFLs and another sack against Syracuse, and he also blew up a screen pass and ran it back for a touchdown. The next week against Cincinnati, he had two more TFLs. Then 2.5 TFLs and two sacks against Rutgers, where he was one of the few players to come out of that debacle with any honor. Seven tackles, two for loss, another sack, and another forced fumble against Miami. Pierre-Paul got it done in just about every game, whether it was against a weak sister or a top-flight opponent. With scouts and draftniks already projecting him as a possible first-round pick, Pierre-Paul declared for the NFL draft in early January, skipping his senior year.

Basically it all boils down to upside. I know that theres a ton of guys picked early due to upside that really shouldn't have been (Dewayne Robertson comes to mind) but as I said before the Giants know how to develop Defensive Lineman and that should be a cause for concern. Luckily we have a LT that will be able to neutralize him.

RT though is another story, and after doing a little bit of research it seems like thats where the Eagles are going to line up Brandon Graham at RE with Trent Cole on the left side. So in the end we could end up with a Graham/Capers rematch which as this point doesn't seem to be in our favor.

[NYCskinfan82]

Originally Posted by Dirtbag359

This is what scouts see though when they look at Pierre-Paul



Basically it all boils down to upside. I know that theres a ton of guys picked early due to upside that really shouldn't have been (Dewayne Robertson comes to mind) but as I said before the Giants know how to develop Defensive Lineman and that should be a cause for concern. Luckily we have a LT that will be able to neutralize him.

RT though is another story, and after doing a little bit of research it seems like thats where the Eagles are going to line up Brandon Graham at RE with Trent Cole on the left side. So in the end we could end up with a Graham/Capers rematch which as this point doesn't seem to be in our favor.

If Graham is RE he will be going up against our LT which should be TW how would it be Capers.

[Dirtbag59]

Originally Posted by NYCskinfan82

If Graham is RE he will be going up against our LT which should be TW how would it be Capers.

Sorry, typo, meant to say LE.

[NYCskinfan82]

Originally Posted by Dirtbag359

Sorry, typo, meant to say LE.

I know what you meant, its just nice to check a person whose post most of the time be on point.