Sarah Palin Endorses Clint Didier For Senate

[Beemnseven]

Oh good christ. They're after him because of what he said about legislation passed over 40 years ago when he was a year old?

It looks as though he has problems with the idea of government forcing private businesses to accept customers they don't want to accept -- much like the reasons Barry Goldwater was against the law. Not because he was a racist or that he hated blacks. Mainly that it was not an area where the federal government has any constitutional jurisdiction.

From a strictly libertarian point of view -- can anyone articulate what the difference is between being forced to allow a customer into your private business and being forced to allow someone into your home?

At what point does the question of freedom of association come into this?

[Hog1]

Originally Posted by Beemnseven

Oh good christ. They're after him because of what he said about legislation passed over 40 years ago when he was a year old?

It looks as though he has problems with the idea of government forcing private businesses to accept customers they don't want to accept -- much like the reasons Barry Goldwater was against the law. Not because he was a racist or that he hated blacks. Mainly that it was not an area where the federal government has any constitutional jurisdiction.

From a strictly libertarian point of view -- can anyone articulate what the difference is between being forced to allow a customer into your private business and being forced to allow someone into your home?

At what point does the question of freedom of association come into this?

I'm going to pretend I did not read that.....Big Brother not welcome...must be a racist?

[Beemnseven]

Originally Posted by Hog1

I'm going to pretend I did not read that.....Big Brother not welcome...must be a racist?

Yep, this is one of those touchy areas where someone can offer a genuine, reasoned argument that's completely devoid of any racism whatsover, who lays out a case against certain portions of what happens to be a historically popular piece of legislation that signified the end of one of our darkest points, -- and yet still be labelled a racist.

If you speak up for the property rights, speech rights, or freedom of religion of a hated group or individual, then inevitably you become part of that hated group or individual.

Gotta love the Democratic Party -- playing to the nuanced views of their voters.

[saden1]

Originally Posted by Beemnseven

Yep, this is one of those touchy areas where someone can offer a genuine, reasoned argument that's completely devoid of any racism whatsover, who lays out a case against certain portions of what happens to be a historically popular piece of legislation that signified the end of one of our darkest points, -- and yet still be labelled a racist.

If you speak up for the property rights, speech rights, or freedom of religion of a hated group or individual, then inevitably you become part of that hated group or individual.

Gotta love the Democratic Party -- playing to the nuanced views of their voters.

Stay on the sideline until you're strong enough and ready to enter a game that requires critical thinking. We wouldn't want you to get a concussions now would we?


p.s. No wonder Libertarians never win any elections...what bunch of silly people.

[Beemnseven]

Originally Posted by saden1

Stay on the sideline until you're strong enough and ready to enter a game that requires critical thinking. We wouldn't want you to get a concussions now would we?


p.s. No wonder Libertarians never win any elections...what bunch of silly people.

Notice how this post doesn't ever actually offer any critical thinking.

Lame threats, grade school retorts, nothing of substance -- typical from you.

[saden1]

Originally Posted by Beemnseven

Notice how this post doesn't ever actually offer any critical thinking.

Lame threats, grade school retorts, nothing of substance -- typical from you.

Someone as absent minded as you doesn't deserve more in a response. Check yourself, most of your post on this threat are pretty retarded dude...and this thread isn't the only thread where your post are wanting. Cut the crap and fix your thinking gaps...like Captain Planet says, "only you have the power."

[joethiesmanfan]

Originally Posted by saden1

Someone as absent minded as you doesn't deserve more in a response. Check yourself, most of your post on this threat are pretty redtarded dude...and this thread isn't the only thread where your post are wanting. Cut the crap and fix your thinking gaps...like Captain Planet says, "only you have the power."

HAHAHAHAHAHA wow

[Beemnseven]

Originally Posted by saden1

Someone as absent minded as you doesn't deserve more in a response. Check yourself, most of your post on this threat are pretty retarded dude...and this thread isn't the only thread where your post are wanting. Cut the crap and fix your thinking gaps...like Captain Planet says, "only you have the power."

Ahh yes, a "Captain Planet" reference. What a brilliant job of proving my point ...

But once again, no actual refutations.

[joethiesmanfan]

Originally Posted by Beemnseven

Notice how this post doesn't ever actually offer any critical thinking.

Lame threats, grade school retorts, nothing of substance -- typical from you.

He is right, Libertarian's philosophy sounds like a utpoian nightmare.

[GusFrerotte]

Originally Posted by saden1

Stay on the sideline until you're strong enough and ready to enter a game that requires critical thinking. We wouldn't want you to get a concussions now would we?


p.s. No wonder Libertarians never win any elections...what bunch of silly people.

Libertarians never win elections since the election laws for 3rd parties are so frigging ridiculous in most states that they have to blow almost all of their $ just to get on the ballot, and the MSM in cahoots with the 2 so called parties(mostly just two wings of the same monstrosity) that they don't get any media coverage. Rand Paul, like his dad is very big on states' rights, and the Constitution, which doesn't sit to well with the poltical establishment, since they are shredding the very laws that they have created.. As for being silly people, do you really like where the two parties have led us? Do you like how they sold the average American out to the International Financiers(Big Banks), Big Pharma, the Military Industrial Complex, etc? Another question for you. Do you still hold Keynsian economics in high regard, since that has been the economic model we have been following for the past 60+ years? Seems both Dems and Reps are still in love with it even when it seems to have created a lot of booms and bust cycles throughout its lifespan. Seems to me "the game " anymore just deals with how low can you go or how much of a sellout you can be anymore. Critical thinking takes more than going along with towing the line of political correctness, which in itself is totally devoid of critical thinking, or much thinking at all!!!!!!

[over the mountain]

Originally Posted by Beemnseven

Oh good christ. They're after him because of what he said about legislation passed over 40 years ago when he was a year old?

It looks as though he has problems with the idea of government forcing private businesses to accept customers they don't want to accept -- much like the reasons Barry Goldwater was against the law. Not because he was a racist or that he hated blacks. Mainly that it was not an area where the federal government has any constitutional jurisdiction.

From a strictly libertarian point of view -- can anyone articulate what the difference is between being forced to allow a customer into your private business and being forced to allow someone into your home?

At what point does the question of freedom of association come into this?

The law was passed in part b/c black people could not find any hotels or motels that would allow them to stay in Florida and the southern states as they traveled down I-95. A florida state case was the case that was brought up to the SC. The SC used the "interstate commerce clause" to stretch the Federal arm into state's rights to regulate their own businesses and laws.

IIRC If florida or any other state wants to allow their hotels and motels to discriminate based upon race, the can but will not recieve any of the federal to state funding for their raodways, etc.

[joethiesmanfan]

Originally Posted by over the mountain

The law was passed in part b/c black people could not find any hotels or motels that would allow them to stay in Florida and the southern states as they traveled down I-95. A florida state case was the case that was brought up to the SC. The SC used the "interstate commerce clause" to stretch the Federal arm into state's rights to regulate their own businesses and laws.

IIRC If florida or any other state wants to allow their hotels and motels to discriminate based upon race, the can but will not recieve any of the federal to state funding for their raodways, etc.

Wrong again, black poepl had their own nationwide chains before desegregatio, own baseball league which made more revenue than the majors, own everything. that is no way to run a country though, that is stupid. Small government is another way of saying sepearation. Funny how they want to seperate after black people made this country rich from hard labor. Wasn't no talk about sepeartion while they were making all those windfall profits selling Europe things that are not European like cotton, sugar, etc. Keep local will Balkanize this country.

[CRedskinsRule]

Originally Posted by joethiesmanfan

Wrong again, black poepl had their own nationwide chains before desegregatio, own baseball league which made more revenue than the majors, own everything. that is no way to run a country though, that is stupid. Small government is another way of saying sepearation. Funny how they want to seperate after black people made this country rich from hard labor. Wasn't no talk about sepeartion while they were making all those windfall profits selling Europe things that are not European like cotton, sugar, etc. Keep local will Balkanize this country.

let me quote Saden

Originally Posted by Saden1

Someone as absent minded as you doesn't deserve more in a response. Check yourself, most of your post on this thread are pretty retarded dude...and this thread isn't the only thread where your post are wanting. Cut the crap and fix your thinking gaps...like Captain Planet says, "only you have the power."

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by joethiesmanfan

Wrong again, black poepl had their own nationwide chains before desegregatio, own baseball league which made more revenue than the majors, own everything. that is no way to run a country though, that is stupid. Small government is another way of saying sepearation. Funny how they want to seperate after black people made this country rich from hard labor. Wasn't no talk about sepeartion while they were making all those windfall profits selling Europe things that are not European like cotton, sugar, etc. Keep local will Balkanize this country.

Correct me if I'm wrong here. Are you saying that the Negro League was preferred by black people? That they preferred to have their own league than play in the major leagues?

[joethiesmanfan]

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

Correct me if I'm wrong here. Are you saying that the Negro League was preferred by black people? That they preferred to have their own league than play in the major leagues?

Not saying that. Just saying that before the majors were integrated there was a Negro league , there were black hotel chains, etc. So to say a black person couldn't get a hotel on I-95 is a stretch to say the least. (That is no way to run a country though) is waht I said as my point after that.