![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 920
|
Re: Greg Cosell on McNabb, Campbell, and Others
Yeah, it still surprises me that they let McNabb go.
- Sure, the eagles haven't gone anywhere for years -- but then again, they were *so close*, and now have young WRs. - Sure, they think they have something with Kolb -- but then again, they already had a ProBowl QB. - Sure, McNabb probably only has 3-4 years left -- but why trade him within-division? I just can't come up with a "reason"... yet. But I agree there's something to it.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: 36.28 x 76.22
Age: 74
Posts: 1,812
|
Re: Greg Cosell on McNabb, Campbell, and Others
Quote:
I think only 2 or 3. That's my new name for McNabb! 2&3! That's what he costs, that's what he is. At least through the part of the season that leads to the POs. After that, he will have earned his usual 5!
__________________
'37, '42, '83, '88, '92. Championship! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 920
|
Re: Greg Cosell on McNabb, Campbell, and Others
So after the season is done:
McNabb (13 games): 3377 yards, 14 td, 15 int J.Campbell (13 games): 2387 yards, 13 td, 8 int We traded McNabb for 2nd (2010) and 4th (2011) We traded JC for 4th rounder (2012) Basically we wasted a 2nd rounder for McNabb, and JC played better than him this year. I think most did not want McNabb - but were conflicted/okay with the trade at the time -- but in hindsight this was a complete waste of a 2nd rounder. Hard to stomach that in the beginning of a coach's tenure -- hope it doesn't happen again. We need all our picks going forward. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|