![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 69
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
I like big (_|_)s.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Age: 44
Posts: 19,264
|
Re: Patrick Ramsey better be Ready!!!!!
Exactly, AND the playcalling will be a bit more aggresive this year too.
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: So. Md.
Age: 45
Posts: 32
|
Re: Patrick Ramsey better be Ready!!!!!
Ramsey does not need to comlete 100% of his passes he does not need to complete 30% of his passes. He does not need to throw more than 20 TD's or less than 10 INT's. Rating Schmating. Patrick Ramsey needs to go 4-2 against the NFC East, 3-1 against the NFC West, and 3-1 against the AFC West. And beat either Chicago or Tampa. However his numbers look after that is ok with me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Hug Anne Spyder
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,596
|
Re: Patrick Ramsey better be Ready!!!!!
yeah we were horrible on third down last year. with an upgraded o line, a nasty defense that will be even nastier with lavar back, okay special teams (im still feeling the loss when we let baltimore win the game by that punt return, and when we could've had a shutout of new york if we didn't give up that kick return), and c.p. we will easily make the playoffs. how about portis's numbers. i see him getting around 1800 yards if he's healthy, and about 15 rushing touchdowns. portis would've had 1500 yards last year if it wasn't for those games where he had like 55 yards, 17 yards, etc.
__________________
Hail to the Football Team |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
I like big (_|_)s.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Age: 44
Posts: 19,264
|
Re: Patrick Ramsey better be Ready!!!!!
I'm also excited to see a rejuvenated line to be able to open the running game up (and passing game).
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Hug Anne Spyder
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,596
|
Re: Patrick Ramsey better be Ready!!!!!
hey drago, who do you think we will lose against in the nfc east, the nfc west, and against the afc west? i think we could easily beat philadelphia,(lets not forget how close we came last year, until ramsey threw that int), we can easily beat st. louis(they have lost easy games last year), and if you think we are gonna lose to the raiders in the afc west you are mightily mistaken cuz even with randy moss they still won't win(look back to our game against the vikes last year).
__________________
Hail to the Football Team |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: So. Md.
Age: 45
Posts: 32
|
Re: Patrick Ramsey better be Ready!!!!!
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
I like big (_|_)s.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Age: 44
Posts: 19,264
|
Re: Patrick Ramsey better be Ready!!!!!
16-0 baby.
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
I like big (_|_)s.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Age: 44
Posts: 19,264
|
Re: Patrick Ramsey better be Ready!!!!!
Exactly. For some reason, it still blows my mind that KC is ANY good.
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Puppy Kicker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 43
Posts: 8,341
|
Re: Patrick Ramsey better be Ready!!!!!
I think the offensive playcaller better be ready!
Uh - you seen their Oline and TE, Malcolm? They also have a pretty good RB.... Offense can win games too! |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
I like big (_|_)s.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Age: 44
Posts: 19,264
|
Re: Patrick Ramsey better be Ready!!!!!
I know, I know. It still blows my mind. I can think of a base of only 3 playmakers. I'm thinking they are a product of a GREAT offensive line.
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 180
|
Re: Patrick Ramsey better be Ready!!!!!
Ramsey is capable of 20 plus td throws. I like Hassellbeck. Don't have the strongest arm, but has alot of fire in his gut.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 43
Posts: 17,620
|
Re: Patrick Ramsey better be Ready!!!!!
roaf and shields can each take out 3 guys a play... that helps...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 519
|
Re: Patrick Ramsey better be Ready!!!!!
Thanks guys.....this was fun....but if Ramsey do hit my marks pretty close.....Say Hello Playoffs
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Crofton, MD
Age: 56
Posts: 907
|
Re: Patrick Ramsey better be Ready!!!!!
I would like him to do well, but I could care less what his numbers are as long as he wins! It's like the question: Would you rather have P. Manning with all his stats, or Brady who just wins? I'd take Brady.
This team is really starting to look like it is being modeled after the Pats, with a tough QB, a good line to protect him, a bunch of good receivers but no true #1, a quality RB, and a top defense. Not to mention working on a budget and letting players go if they will cost too much. It's that blue-collar mentality that ironically is how Gibbs teams in the 80's were built. I'm expecting some very good things this year! |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|