Condoms For First Graders?

[JoeRedskin]

Originally Posted by Mattyk

#1 - kids no sexy time - agreed. There should be no problem reaching a group consensus on this one.

#2 - kids are the responsibility of parents and society at large. No way we will reach a consensus here.

No.2: As I said to TTE, before we talk about what the appropriate solution is and who's responsibilty it is, would you agree that child sex has an effect on the public health.

[MTK]

Originally Posted by JoeRedskin

No.2: As I said to TTE, before we talk about what the appropriate solution is and who's responsibilty it is, would you agree that child sex has an effect on the public health.

of course

[mredskins]

Originally Posted by Mattyk

of course

Matty get out get out you are falling into their trap of endless blab.

[CRedskinsRule]

Originally Posted by mredskins

Matty get out get out you are falling into their trap of endless blab.

who is "their"?

and why is trying to start a discussion from a point of consensus considered endless blab?

as for the discussion, good luck joe.

[JoeRedskin]

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

who is "their"?

and why is trying to start a discussion from a point of consensus considered endless blab?

as for the discussion, good luck joe.

Yeah, I know. Can't force anyone to agree. Was hoping, for a change, that people might actually try looking at things differently.

[GMScud]

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

who is "their"?

and why is trying to start a discussion from a point of consensus considered endless blab?

as for the discussion, good luck joe.

Seriously. Might as well resurrect the "Never Ending Thread" and just merge it with this, because it will go on forever.

Personally I think the notion of putting condoms in the hands of 6 year olds is waaaay beyond retarded. But every liberal on this site will just shake their head at anything else I have to say on the matter.

I'm somewhere in between Matty and Buster on this issue. I'll leave it at that. Delving into it any further will be wasted energy. I have and will continue to enjoy reading this thread though.

Happy Friday everyone.

[MTK]

Originally Posted by GMScud

Seriously. Might as well resurrect the "Never Ending Thread" and just merge it with this, because it will go on forever.

Personally I think the notion of putting condoms in the hands of 6 year olds is waaaay beyond retarded. But every liberal on this site will just shake their head at anything else I have to say on the matter.

I'm somewhere in between Matty and Buster on this issue. I'll leave it at that. Delving into it any further will be wasted energy. I have and will continue to enjoy reading this thread though.

Happy Friday everyone.

The idea of a 6 year old with a condom is definitely way beyond retarded, but then again so is the idea of a 6 year old having sex in the first place.

I'm definitely not saying the answer is to hand out condoms like candy, but I also don't think the answer is to think telling kids "no" is going to stop them.

I'm more towards the middle of the argument than I may have let on. Either way, I just don't see an easy answer here.

[mredskins]

Originally Posted by Mattyk

The idea of a 6 year old with a condom is definitely way beyond retarded, but then again so is the idea of a 6 year old having sex in the first place.

I'm definitely not saying the answer is to hand out condoms like candy, but I also don't think the answer is to think telling kids "no" is going to stop them.

I'm more towards the middle of the argument than I may have let on. Either way, I just don't see an easy answer here.

There is no easy answer each child is a case by case basis. I will teach in my home about sex to my child and when the school does it to him it should be a refresher not a surprise. Sadly though many parents don't teach their children about sex and they learn either through experiment, pornography or from word of mouth, this is when schools need to step in at the correct age.

For the record I don't believe a six year old should have a condom but he/ she should know the correct terms for their genital and also understand how babies are made on a high level, not that they are flown in from a big bird.

I know I am getting sucked in but is a boring Friday afternoon at the office.

[GMScud]

Originally Posted by Mattyk

I'm definitely not saying the answer is to hand out condoms like candy, but I also don't think the answer is to think telling kids "no" is going to stop them.

Totally agree.

[JoeRedskin]

Originally Posted by mredskins

Matty get out get out you are falling into their trap of endless blab.

lol - quite frankly, and pretty obviously, I never thought Matty would be the problem.

[souperbad]

Kids got it tough these days. Not only do they have to draw inside the lines...now they have to worry about the clap.

[Trample the Elderly]

Originally Posted by souperbad

Kids got it tough these days. Not only do they have to draw inside the lines...now they have to worry about the clap.

[Trample the Elderly]

Originally Posted by JoeRedskin

No.2: As I said to TTE, before we talk about what the appropriate solution is and who's responsibilty it is, would you agree that child sex has an effect on the public health.

Do you agree that Jews and Slavs are detrimental to the racial hygene of the Aryan race? Do you agree that Christians are tools of the West to undermine the Party and should be eliminated? Do you think that Saddam Hussein has aerial vehicles cappable of spreading mustard gas all over the East Coast and should therefore be removed?

I don't subscribe to fear mongering. No, it doesn't take a village to raise a child. It takes a mother and father. Why is it people think they have the right and responsibility to stick their noses in other people's business? If they want condoms in Mass for their kids, fine. Dumb Northerners get what they deserve! While they're at it, how about a bong hit?

Baby bong pic sparks fury | The Sun |News

Because children need to know about the dangers of drug abuse.

[JoeRedskin]

Deleted.

[budw38]

Originally Posted by JoeRedskin

No.2: As I said to TTE, before we talk about what the appropriate solution is and who's responsibilty it is, would you agree that child sex has an effect on the public health.

Yes it does , STD's , counsling , therapy , unwanted pregnancy , which can , 1) destroy a family or two , cause financial burden ( families ) and tax payers , and could damage ability of child/children to get a better education because they are forced to raise a child at a young age . I think the parents are resposible , so if two 16 year old produce , and have a baby ... the parents are financialy obligated to help raise/provide for the grandchild , maybe only in cases where the parents were opposed to condom use ..... tough call on much of the debate , i do have to add .... no way kids under < maybe 12 > should be treated as adults , which IMO giving them condoms does just that . Just my 2 cents .