Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-31-2010, 02:15 PM   #1
GMScud
Swearinger
 
GMScud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
Re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
Wonder if they'll even go 6 deep at this point
Yeah, regardless of if we go 5 or 6, our receiving corps is suspect at best. Amongst the worst in the league IMO. Cooley and Davis are going to see a lot of targets.
__________________
Tardy
GMScud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2010, 02:30 PM   #2
saden1
MVP
 
saden1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 47
Posts: 10,069
Re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

Quote:
Originally Posted by GMScud View Post
Yeah, regardless of if we go 5 or 6, our receiving corps is suspect at best. Amongst the worst in the league IMO. Cooley and Davis are going to see a lot of targets.
Among worst? Ouch...your WRs are as good as the QB throwing to them. Those beautiful on point bullets that McNabb throws are going to make them look good....real good.
__________________
"The Redskins have always suffered from chronic organizational deformities under Snyder."

-Jenkins
saden1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2010, 03:20 PM   #3
GMScud
Swearinger
 
GMScud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
Re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

Quote:
Originally Posted by saden1 View Post
Among worst? Ouch...your WRs are as good as the QB throwing to them. Those beautiful on point bullets that McNabb throws are going to make them look good....real good.
Not sure if you're being sarcastic here or not. Assuming you're not... point on bullets from McNabb? He's notorious for throwing at receivers' feet. Or behind them. However, McNabb has had good seasons with guys like Reggie Brown, Todd Pinkston, and Freddie Mitchell. But that was also with Brian Westbrook in his prime. Yes, I think right now on paper we've got one of the worst receiving corps in the league. How many teams in the league would have Santana Moss as their #1? Ick.
__________________
Tardy
GMScud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2010, 03:57 PM   #4
saden1
MVP
 
saden1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 47
Posts: 10,069
Re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

Quote:
Originally Posted by GMScud View Post
Not sure if you're being sarcastic here or not. Assuming you're not... point on bullets from McNabb? He's notorious for throwing at receivers' feet. Or behind them. However, McNabb has had good seasons with guys like Reggie Brown, Todd Pinkston, and Freddie Mitchell. But that was also with Brian Westbrook in his prime. Yes, I think right now on paper we've got one of the worst receiving corps in the league. How many teams in the league would have Santana Moss as their #1? Ick.
I am not being sarcastic at all...McNabb can throw the deep ball, the out route, fade, the hook, the slat, etc. No more waiting on the QB to throw the damn ball as soon as the WR makes a cut. Sure, he's no Payton Manning but he's better than 90% of the QBs in the league...and the fact that he threw 70% and he had such shitty receivers gives me hope that him and our receivers are going to have a magical year. We'll know soon enough.
__________________
"The Redskins have always suffered from chronic organizational deformities under Snyder."

-Jenkins
saden1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2010, 04:10 PM   #5
tryfuhl
Gamebreaker
 
tryfuhl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 43
Posts: 12,514
Re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

Quote:
Originally Posted by saden1 View Post
I am not being sarcastic at all...McNabb can throw the deep ball, the out route, fade, the hook, the slat, etc. No more waiting on the QB to throw the damn ball as soon as the WR makes a cut. Sure, he's no Payton Manning but he's better than 90% of the QBs in the league...and the fact that he threw 70% and he had such shitty receivers gives me hope that him and our receivers are going to have a magical year. We'll know soon enough.
Better than 90% puts him in the top 3ish QBs, which he is not.
tryfuhl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2010, 04:14 PM   #6
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

Quote:
Originally Posted by tryfuhl View Post
Better than 90% puts him in the top 3ish QBs, which he is not.
He didn't say 90% of the starting QBs, just the QBs...which puts him in the top 10ish...which he could be
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2010, 04:16 PM   #7
tryfuhl
Gamebreaker
 
tryfuhl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 43
Posts: 12,514
Re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
He didn't say 90% of the starting QBs, just the QBs...which puts him in the top 10ish...which he could be
touche
tryfuhl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2010, 04:27 PM   #8
saden1
MVP
 
saden1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 47
Posts: 10,069
Re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

Quote:
Originally Posted by tryfuhl View Post
Better than 90% puts him in the top 3ish QBs, which he is not.
Brady, Manning, and Favre....who else is better than McNabb?
__________________
"The Redskins have always suffered from chronic organizational deformities under Snyder."

-Jenkins
saden1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2010, 04:29 PM   #9
wilsowilso
Registered User
 
wilsowilso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Age: 53
Posts: 2,841
Re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

Quote:
Originally Posted by saden1 View Post
Brady, Manning, and Favre....who else is better than McNabb?
Drew Brees might be the best QB in the NFL and Aaron Rodgers is going to have another monster year.

I say McNabb is easy top ten, but not top five.
wilsowilso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2010, 04:30 PM   #10
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
Re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

Drew Brees?
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2010, 04:32 PM   #11
GMScud
Swearinger
 
GMScud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
Re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

Quote:
Originally Posted by saden1 View Post
Brady, Manning, and Favre....who else is better than McNabb?
For 2010 I'd take Manning, Brady, Aaron Rogers, Tony Romo, Drew Brees, Philip Rivers, and probably Matt Schaub and Brett Favre over McNabb. I do think he's in the lower half of the top 10 in the league, which is still pretty darn good.
__________________
Tardy
GMScud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2010, 04:32 PM   #12
tryfuhl
Gamebreaker
 
tryfuhl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 43
Posts: 12,514
Re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

Quote:
Originally Posted by saden1 View Post
Brady, Manning, and Favre....who else is better than McNabb?
Brees, Rodgers, Rivers first come to mind

then you can argue Schaub, Roethlisberger, Romo and little Manning
tryfuhl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2010, 07:28 PM   #13
wilsowilso
Registered User
 
wilsowilso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Age: 53
Posts: 2,841
Re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

Quote:
Originally Posted by saden1 View Post
Brady, Manning, and Favre....who else is better than McNabb?
Hey folks weren't we just talking about this very subject this morning.

From Peyton Manning to Jake Delhomme, ESPN's John Clayton ranks the NFL's starting QBs - ESPN
wilsowilso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2010, 07:32 PM   #14
SirClintonPortis
Pro Bowl
 
SirClintonPortis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,052
Re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

Quote:
Originally Posted by saden1 View Post
Brady, Manning, and Favre....who else is better than McNabb?
Jay Cutler is the smexiness. I would count Rapistberger too. He did significantly help a team with a shitty Oline actually win a Super Bowl.
__________________
Analysis using datasets (aka stats) is an attempt at reverse-engineering a player's "goodness".

Virtuosity remembered, douchebaggery forgotten.

The ideal character profile shoved down modern Western men and women's throats is Don Juan.
SirClintonPortis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2010, 04:13 PM   #15
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
Re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

Quote:
Originally Posted by saden1 View Post
I am not being sarcastic at all...McNabb can throw the deep ball, the out route, fade, the hook, the slat, etc. No more waiting on the QB to throw the damn ball as soon as the WR makes a cut. Sure, he's no Payton Manning but he's better than 90% of the QBs in the league...and the fact that he threw 70% and he had such shitty receivers gives me hope that him and our receivers are going to have a magical year. We'll know soon enough.
He speaks of the little-known positively correlated relationship between magical-ness and shittyness.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.51057 seconds with 11 queries