![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,121
|
Re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR
Thomas is our biggest WR, most physical, and he returns kicks.
I just don't see him getting the axe. Given the team's patience with Kelly, I would really be surprised to see Thomas get dropped. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Age: 53
Posts: 2,841
|
Re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR
Quote:
Devin Thomas is terrible at returning kicks. Why do people think he is in line for that job? I do think his blocking on the punt return team is what stands out most favorably. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 43
Posts: 12,514
|
Re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR
Terrible? I'd say average
__________________
http://www.twitter.com/RedskinsRT |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,121
|
Re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR
Because he's been listed on the depth chart as the main KR since camp opened. He's certainly in the mix.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 3,767
|
Re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR
Quote:
He is big, but I would NOT call him physical by any stretch. What I am noticing his main problem as WR running routes is he can not maintain a high speed when running square-in patterns. It might be his weak knees, but he is fine run a deep route or running in a straight line, but if he has to run a 90 degree corner in his route he has to slow down. Which might explain the whole not getting enough separation from DB issue. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR
Quote:
Kelly, I think, would have been a very easy cut -- it's not like he has a great shot to make the team next year. But if Shanny already knows Thomas is gone, it makes more sense to not dump Kelly at the same time. With that said, every spot is open after Moss and Armstrong. Still skeptical that Galloway or Wade or Roydell Williams have a chance to make it, but this team does have more invested in both Banks and Austin than Thomas. I think that's a really bad sign for Thomas, especially now that we know Kelly is going to open next offseason with the team.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | ||
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 4,347
|
Re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
"I would bet.....(if), an angel fairy came down and said, '[You can have anything] in the world you would like to own,' I wouldn't be surprised if you said a football club and particularly the Washington Redskins.'' — Jack Kent Cooke, 1996. |
||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|