2007 Uncapped Year

[saden1]

From the article:

The union wants the players' salary cap based on teams' total football revenues, rather than the current system

Are they fucking serious? The whole reason the cap exists is to level the playing field. 64% of Redskins revenue is 156.8 million (245 million * 0.64). 64% of Arizona Cardinal's revenue is 83.84 million (131 million * 0.64). This seems like a disastrous idea to me. I'd rather there be NFL labor stoppage.

Forbes : NFL Revenues

[saden1]

Or maybe the want to add up the total teams' revenue and then divide that number by 32 teams and then multiply that number by 64%. If this is what they want then the salary cap would jump to 106.6 million (5330 billion / 32 * 0.64) based on current figures.

[offiss]

Originally Posted by saden1

From the article:



Are they fucking serious? The whole reason the cap exists is to level the playing field. 64% of Redskins revenue is 156.8 million (245 million * 0.64). 64% of Arizona Cardinal's revenue is 83.84 million (131 million * 0.64). This seems like a disastrous idea to me. I'd rather there be NFL labor stoppage.

Forbes : NFL Revenues

I hope they strike, if they do I will bet the farm we win the SB!

2-0 in strike year's baby!:headbange