![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 389
|
Re: 2007 Uncapped Year
Any huge increase like what the PFA are looking for will just cause more problems . There are two caps in football the calculated salary cap enforced by the NFL and then the actual amount of money teams can afford to pay out . This would lead to a situation of a splitting fo the teams between the haves and have nots .
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Rockville
Age: 63
Posts: 795
|
Re: 2007 Uncapped Year
That is exactly the point why they can not come to an agreement. The NFLPA want the haves, such as the Redskins, Cowboys, Texans, to include more of their revenue stream in the calculation. Local advertising, local TV, suites, and club seats are among the items that teams are exempt from sharing. Since Danny and Jerry have come to town they have found ways to raise that revenue stream. Now the players want a share of that to. Since the CBA already states that there will be a no cap year at the end of the agreement, 2007 has always been in play. Thats why I have been constantly stating the Redskins based on there contracts last year and this year have been angling fo the 2007 season. I believe if you ask Crazy he also sees the wisdom in this.
__________________
16-0 for 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,393
|
Re: 2007 Uncapped Year
If there is an uncapped year, we need to sign all of the players we would like to keep to long term contracts that year. NO SIGNING BONUSES. Huge 1st year money with minimum salaries over the remainders of the contracts. Then, we pay a huge amount one year to keep the core guys we want while arranging for lots of cap space in upcoming years.
For example, take Samuels new contract. Currently he makes 52 million over the next seven years. We could rework his contract to be 46 million in base salary in the uncapped year and 1 million per for the next 6 years. If we take that same type of approach with our top 5 contracts (Samuels, Arrington, Griffin, Portis and Springs **leaving out the Brunell contract for obvious reasons**), then we would play these 5 players around 150 million in base salary in the uncapped year and we get to keep them for another 6 years past the uncapped year at 5 million per year for all 5 of them. Thats around 20-30 million per year in extra cap space that we would save by taking a huge hit in the uncapped year. Of course, I don't actually think there will be an uncapped year, but here's to delusions of grandeur. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,121
|
Re: 2007 Uncapped Year
Quote:
Seems like the league is asking for trouble, I'm sure Snyder is drooling at the idea of an uncapped year. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Rehoboth Beach, DE
Posts: 3,494
|
Re: 2007 Uncapped Year
Quote:
The uncapped year is perhaps the greatest potential boon to players currently in the league - ever. 2008 rookies will do better as well, since current players will all average, oh, league minimum if the system is abused to its full advantage. A free agent in 2007 will actually walk around making "cha-ching" noises.
__________________
There's nowhere to go but up. Or down. I guess we could stay where we are, too. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|