Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Annual Predict the Final Roster Thread: 2010 Version

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-04-2010, 04:42 AM   #1
tryfuhl
Gamebreaker
 
tryfuhl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 43
Posts: 12,514
Re: Annual Predict the Final Roster Thread: 2010 Version

I think at the possession receiver area we can use our TEs

if we don't feel that we can make them available at most plays it's an option

really at this point I'd love to have Moss in the slot vs Housh or whoever
tryfuhl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2010, 09:00 AM   #2
2BIG2BSKINNY
Special Teams
 
2BIG2BSKINNY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Franklin, TN
Posts: 214
Re: Annual Predict the Final Roster Thread: 2010 Version

Quote:
Originally Posted by tryfuhl View Post
I think at the possession receiver area we can use our TEs

if we don't feel that we can make them available at most plays it's an option

really at this point I'd love to have Moss in the slot vs Housh or whoever
You are probably right at this point! I guess that the young receivers if they work out will pay bigger rewards the longer they hold on! I guess I still have a little of the old regimes bad habits...like smoking you may know it is bad for you but you still swear it settles your nerves every time you breakdown!!!
2BIG2BSKINNY is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.33059 seconds with 11 queries