Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


2010 Redskins Final Cutdown

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-04-2010, 08:50 PM   #1
GusFrerotte
Registered User
 
GusFrerotte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 4,153
Re: 2010 Redskins Final Cutdown

Wow all our 7th round picks got cut. Only goes to show you why you should do all you can to keep your first and second rounders.
GusFrerotte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2010, 08:58 PM   #2
CRedskinsRule
Living Legend
 
CRedskinsRule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 59
Posts: 21,744
Re: 2010 Redskins Final Cutdown

Quote:
Originally Posted by GusFrerotte View Post
Wow all our 7th round picks got cut. Only goes to show you why you should do all you can to keep your first and second rounders.
Well, they will most likely go to the practice squad, and when we go to 18 games, and increase the roster, they will make the team!
CRedskinsRule is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2010, 08:51 PM   #3
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
Re: 2010 Redskins Final Cutdown

We've actually cut down to 52 by my count, so we are free to pick up somebody off waivers.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2010, 08:53 PM   #4
ethat001
Impact Rookie
 
ethat001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 920
Re: 2010 Redskins Final Cutdown

Hoooooossh.
ethat001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2010, 08:56 PM   #5
PHazard
Special Teams
 
PHazard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Originally Portsmouth, VA but now Ocala, FL
Posts: 207
Re: 2010 Redskins Final Cutdown

The fact Roydell Williams made our roster makes me ****ing nauseous.
__________________
If "The Future is Now" why would we use our #4 Pick on a QB who will spend the 1st year on the bench?
PHazard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2010, 08:56 PM   #6
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
Re: 2010 Redskins Final Cutdown

Defense:

DL (8) -- Golston, Haynesworth, Carriker, Kemoeatu, Daniels, Holliday, A. Bryant, Jarmon
LB (8) -- Fletcher, McIntosh, Orakpo, Carter, Blades, Riley, Alexander, Wilson
CB (5) -- Rogers, Hall, Buchanon, Barnes, Westbrook
S (4) -- Landry, Doughty, Horton, Moore

That's 25 on Defense.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2010, 08:56 PM   #7
artmonkforhallofamein07
Pro Bowl
 
artmonkforhallofamein07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Charleston , SC
Posts: 5,001
Re: 2010 Redskins Final Cutdown

I think we may need a LB and WR. If we sign a WR another one goes off our roster.

With losing Henson, I think we need to get a solid ILB to go along with the current group. Blades cannot be trusted in the new scheme. He cannot even make a tackle anymore.
__________________
Just win.
artmonkforhallofamein07 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2010, 08:58 PM   #8
artmonkforhallofamein07
Pro Bowl
 
artmonkforhallofamein07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Charleston , SC
Posts: 5,001
Re: 2010 Redskins Final Cutdown

Blades, Wilson, Westbrook, Alexander, and Riley will all be big on special teams coverage.
__________________
Just win.
artmonkforhallofamein07 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2010, 08:59 PM   #9
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
Re: 2010 Redskins Final Cutdown

Offense:

QB (3): McNabb, Grossman, Beck
RB (5): Portis, Johnson, Williams, Sellers, Young
WR (6): Moss, Armstrong, Thomas, Galloway, Williams, Banks
TE (2): Cooley, Davis
OL (8): Trent Williams, Dockery, Rabach, Hicks, Brown, Lichtensteiger, Heyer, Will Montgomery

That's 24 on offense. Room for one more. Will Montgomery is the lone Groundhog Day inclusion. Anthony Bryant the other real surprise on defense.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2010, 09:01 PM   #10
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
Re: 2010 Redskins Final Cutdown

Logan Paulsen is listed on Ryan O'Halloran's 53 man. I've seen him listed as a confirmed cut for many hours.

Redskins Set 53-Man Roster

If we still have Paulsen, that's a full roster.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2010, 09:05 PM   #11
CRedskinsRule
Living Legend
 
CRedskinsRule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 59
Posts: 21,744
Re: 2010 Redskins Final Cutdown

Rich_Campbell

So it does. Tryon (traded) is not on the list. nRT @JoeWebDesign: @Rich_Campbell If you read the article, it states Paulsen made the team 2 minutes ago via TweetDeck

Wow, can getting to 53 be anymore complicated
CRedskinsRule is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2010, 09:13 PM   #12
artmonkforhallofamein07
Pro Bowl
 
artmonkforhallofamein07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Charleston , SC
Posts: 5,001
Re: 2010 Redskins Final Cutdown

yep... 21 players cut and 1 traded.

Logan Paulsen makes the team. Thanks Gtripp for pointing out the guys I missed.
__________________
Just win.
artmonkforhallofamein07 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2010, 09:20 PM   #13
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
Re: 2010 Redskins Final Cutdown

We did a poor job selecting offensive lineman. Period. We were a better team if you gave us a random ten-man OL from the 80 man roster than we are now. This team has Rabach, Hicks, and Will Montgomery on it. That's bad, and it's worse when you realize we cut people to get to that.

Lichtensteiger is going to be good for this team, but he can't start at both RG and C AND be the third TE. We have little behind Rabach/Hicks. I didn't think we needed to keep more than eight, necessarily, but I also didn't think our solution to having a log jam of interior OL prospects was to cut them all.

I think we did well at wide receiver. We have a good balance between special teamers, speedsters, and route running technicians. We kept all the keeper WRs we had, possible exception to Terrence Austin, who probably isn't going too far if we need him. I like keeping Darryl Young a lot as the (season-)long term project at FB. And I think they did as well as they could have with the RBs. Torain is probably better than Johnson, but the contract they gave to Johnson backed them into a corner. Williams was a keeper.

I think we might be a bit thin in the back seven, particularly in the secondary, but if we use Chris Horton to the best of his talents, we can get a package linebacker out of him, eliminating the need to keep more than eight. I don't know why Byron Westbrook has as many lives as he does. No idea.

In conclusion, I think we butchered the offensive line, while doing well elsewhere. Or in other words, kind of like last year.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2010, 09:29 PM   #14
SirClintonPortis
Pro Bowl
 
SirClintonPortis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,052
Re: 2010 Redskins Final Cutdown

At least there is the hope that bootlegs and the use of zone-blocking on pass plays can at least somwhat mitigate the awful we might experience should the starters go down.
__________________
Analysis using datasets (aka stats) is an attempt at reverse-engineering a player's "goodness".

Virtuosity remembered, douchebaggery forgotten.

The ideal character profile shoved down modern Western men and women's throats is Don Juan.
SirClintonPortis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2010, 09:55 PM   #15
Lotus
Fire Bruce NOW
 
Lotus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
Re: 2010 Redskins Final Cutdown

Thanks for putting the cuts in neat summary lists, GTripp.

As for Westbrook, I've come to the conclusion that he has a very powerful guardian angel. There is no other explanation.

Austin had better be on the PS. I think he was robbed by a geriatric who couldn't get on the field in the past and hardly lit it up in the preseason.
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250)
Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350)
Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444)
Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430)
We won more with Vinny
Lotus is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.98331 seconds with 11 queries