![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 53
|
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
The main thing Mcnabb did on Snday night that impressed me was keeping drives alive and not turning the ball over. I'm sure the TD's will come as we move forward in the season.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Warpath Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 35,307
|
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
I'm still trying to figure out why Galloway is starting? He was basically a ghost in games in the preseason and last nite in the game he was no where to be found. Armstrong was a flat out disappointment.
Thomas needs to be in the game, he was absolutely great on kickoff returns.
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler He Gets Us |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Gamebreaker
![]() Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 13,237
|
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
Quote:
DT almost broke it on the one up the middle and the kicker got him, he need to put a move on him and he would have been too the house.
__________________
When life gives you paper jams, turn them into paper footballs! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 62
Posts: 15,817
|
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
Lets give this a game or two. We were playing a very good D and a new O with a new QB so its not going to be to pretty starting off.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 59
Posts: 21,744
|
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
It sounds like Armstrong had more on his mind then just the game.
D.C. Sports Bog - Anthony Armstrong screams at the Dallas bench |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,052
|
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
Quote:
__________________
Analysis using datasets (aka stats) is an attempt at reverse-engineering a player's "goodness". Virtuosity remembered, douchebaggery forgotten. The ideal character profile shoved down modern Western men and women's throats is Don Juan. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 47
Posts: 17,460
|
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
Quote:
The game can't end on a defensive penalty...offensive doesn't matter. I guess I should move this post to the pet peeves thread for today.
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,592
|
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 62
Posts: 15,817
|
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
What the hell was he yelling. "Hey ass holes see we didn't even need that f***ing touchdown I dropped".
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 47
Posts: 17,460
|
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
Quote:
Sundberg could have yelled something similar.
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,050
|
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
I'm going to guess that the gameplan was a bit scaled down for McNabb last night and that's probably why he didn't spread it around. As he gets more comfortable I think he will get more guys involved.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 62
Posts: 15,817
|
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
I did not realize how well that ball was thrown until I just saw the pic in the above link. I hope it was just his nerves and this is not the start of any trend.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,050
|
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
The first fade to Armstrong was right on the money, he just flat out dropped it. The 2nd was better defended, but the pass was still right there.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Naega jeil jal naga
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 40
Posts: 14,750
|
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
We should put in Thomas if for nothing more then the fact that he's among the better blockers playing receiver.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice." - Scooter "I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now." - FRPLG |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Norfolk, Va (OV)
Posts: 1,566
|
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
Prediction: Thomas will play ahead of Armstrong against HOU.
__________________
'Any NFL team will win with RG3. Imagine how exciting it will be watching him do it.' |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|