Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


(Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!

Locker Room Main Forum


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 09-07-2010, 09:27 AM   #5
Paintrain
Pro Bowl
 
Paintrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 55
Posts: 5,006
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!

I don't think our WR are as bad as many in the media say they are (Mosely said yesterday the Redskins have the worst WR in the NFL) but also not as good as many of us think they can be. As a unit (TE not included) we are in the lower third of the WR corp in the league. If we include the TE, then it's middle of the pack.

As I posted in another thread, all but 2 playoff teams last year featured the TE as one of their top 3 options, 5 of them had the TE in the top 2. We don't need a fantasy team of WR to be effective and productive in the passing game.

The biggest difference maker in the passing game this year will be the running game. If we can run, McNabb will make teams pay with the pass.
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom
1981-2014

I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life!

Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier
Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman
Paintrain is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.90080 seconds with 11 queries