Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


The never ending Jason Campbell player haters ball

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-14-2010, 11:31 AM   #1
30gut
Playmaker
 
30gut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
re: The never ending Jason Campbell player haters ball

Quote:
Originally Posted by Longtimefan View Post
His ardent supporters can now use the same excuse they used when he was here. The Raiders O/L may be sub-par to the one he just moved on from. There comes a time when excuses exhaust themselves.
Your above statement is not logical.
If something is true it remains true regardless of how many times it repeated.
OL play will always effect QB play.
Its not an excuse it simple football 101.

E.g. Imagine your sprinting 100 meters with a parachute on your back against people that don't; in your 4th race does having a parachute on your back become an excuse?
30gut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2010, 11:39 AM   #2
MonkFan4Life
The Starter
 
MonkFan4Life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Age: 49
Posts: 1,851
re: The never ending Jason Campbell player haters ball

Quote:
Originally Posted by 30gut View Post
Your above statement is not logical.
If something is true it remains true regardless of how many times it repeated.
OL play will always effect QB play.
Its not an excuse it simple football 101.

E.g. Imagine your sprinting 100 meters with a parachute on your back against people that don't; in your 4th race does having a parachute on your back become an excuse?
Football 101 should also say that you shouldn't pump fake an open guy only to check down a player that is covered.

Ex. It's 2nd and 10 and you're in a shotgun formation. Your offesnsive line gives you good protection and you pump fake a receiver that is open only to check down to your running back in the flat. Would you balme the GM, or the owner, or the O-Line for that ?
__________________
Catch me on YouTube !

http://www.youtube.com/user/DowntimeRB?feature=mhw5

The "punishment" by the league : "It's like getting a ticket for going too fast on a road a week ago and they changed the speed limit today"
MonkFan4Life is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2010, 12:00 PM   #3
Longtimefan
Playmaker
 
Longtimefan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Germantown, Md.
Posts: 4,832
re: The never ending Jason Campbell player haters ball

Quote:
Originally Posted by 30gut View Post
Your above statement is not logical.
If something is true it remains true regardless of how many times it repeated.
OL play will always effect QB play.
Its not an excuse it simple football 101.

E.g. Imagine your sprinting 100 meters with a parachute on your back against people that don't; in your 4th race does having a parachute on your back become an excuse?
The statement "There comes a time when excuses exhaust temselves" is only intended to express the mind-set of those who proclaim using the deficiencies of the o/lines as a declaration for the acceptance of failure is not acceptable. The mind-set of JC's detractors are that the we can no longer use o/line as an excuse, it has worn out it's welcome. Nothing ilogical about it at all IMO.
__________________
A revolution is coming and it will be televised.
Longtimefan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2010, 12:58 PM   #4
30gut
Playmaker
 
30gut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
re: The never ending Jason Campbell player haters ball

Quote:
Originally Posted by Longtimefan View Post
The statement "There comes a time when excuses exhaust temselves" is only intended to express the mind-set of those who proclaim using the deficiencies of the o/lines as a declaration for the acceptance of failure is not acceptable. The mind-set of JC's detractors are that the we can no longer use o/line as an excuse, it has worn out it's welcome. Nothing ilogical about it at all IMO.

The number of times a statement X is repeated has no effect upon the validity of the statement.
Which is kinda ironic considering your essentially using the same illogic to make your point.
You just repeated the same statement you made before.
It doesn't matter how many times you repeat your statement its doesn't become more logical with repetition.
30gut is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.21857 seconds with 11 queries