Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Could Hasselbeck be Gone?

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-21-2005, 08:52 AM   #1
TheMalcolmConnection
I like big (_|_)s.
 
TheMalcolmConnection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Age: 45
Posts: 19,272
Re: Could Hasselbeck be Gone?

The Dolphins are living proof that having a great runningback makes your QBs look that much better... Look how they performed THIS year.
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.
TheMalcolmConnection is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2005, 09:40 AM   #2
jdlea
Playmaker
 
jdlea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, VA
Age: 42
Posts: 3,109
Re: Could Hasselbeck be Gone?

I hope he does go for exactly the sentiment that has been expressed on this board. All of the Tim Hasselbeck is better than Ramsey chatter is BS. He's no better than Brunell. Whenever either Brunell or Hasselbeck take the field, I expect the Skins to lose the game. I have 0 faith in them.
jdlea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2005, 10:20 AM   #3
Uncle Kracker
Camp Scrub
 
Uncle Kracker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Salisbury, NC
Posts: 6
Re: Could Hasselbeck be Gone?

I'll miss his wife more than anything else....

He was servicable at the most. But his arm is very, very weak.
Uncle Kracker is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.34381 seconds with 11 queries