Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Packers OL may be missing a starter on Sunday

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-07-2010, 11:26 PM   #16
GusFrerotte
Registered User
 
GusFrerotte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 4,153
Re: Packers OL may be missing a starter on Sunday

Quote:
Originally Posted by SUNRA View Post
Even better news: New Jersey Star Ledger reported today, that Green Bay will be without LB Nick Barnett, and two starting safeties Morgan Burnett and Nick Collins. There should be no reason why Mcnabb and Co. shouldn't score at will on this secondary.

OK, now if we don't light it up against the Packers D something is very wrong with our O. Hopefully this will be a 4 TD day for Donovan and co.
GusFrerotte is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 10-07-2010, 11:29 PM   #17
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Packers OL may be missing a starter on Sunday

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lotus View Post
Green Bay is so banged up on both sides of the ball, they are ripe for the picking if we play well.
I hope the players aren't gettingbtoo confident with all these injuries. I have some concerns with how up they'll be for this game. There's no division rival/Mcnabb returns home storyline for this game
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2010, 11:33 PM   #18
GusFrerotte
Registered User
 
GusFrerotte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 4,153
Re: Packers OL may be missing a starter on Sunday

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
I hope the players aren't gettingbtoo confident with all these injuries. I have some concerns with how up they'll be for this game. There's no division rival/Mcnabb returns home storyline for this game

Yeah exactly Smooty. The thing that scares me is the blatant inconsistency from this team. In both of our wins, the D has carried the team. In our losses the offense was decent, but the D was a sieve.
GusFrerotte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2010, 12:23 AM   #19
CultBrennan59
Pro Bowl
 
CultBrennan59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,526
Re: Packers OL may be missing a starter on Sunday

Keep in mind Aaron Rodgers is great with bad OLines, so losing a RT shouldn't be a game changer for us, especially if Bulaga and Clifton are still there. Now Rodgers or Greg Jennings or Jermichael Finely being out on Offense, or Woodson being out on Defense...thats a different story...
__________________
"Anyones better than Madieu Williams"
CultBrennan59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2010, 12:32 AM   #20
Lotus
Fire Bruce NOW
 
Lotus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
Re: Packers OL may be missing a starter on Sunday

Quote:
Originally Posted by GusFrerotte View Post
Yeah exactly Smooty. The thing that scares me is the blatant inconsistency from this team. In both of our wins, the D has carried the team. In our losses the offense was decent, but the D was a sieve.
Yup. You never know who will show up. That's why I said, "if we play well" above. Maybe being back home or the opportunity to break above .500 will motivate the boys.

We need SmootSmack to use his media connections to invent an inflammatory quote from Aaron Rodgers. Like "Aaron Rodgers said today, 'The Redskins are a bunch of weenie losers.'"
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250)
Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350)
Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444)
Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430)
We won more with Vinny
Lotus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2010, 02:43 AM   #21
artmonkforhallofamein07
Pro Bowl
 
artmonkforhallofamein07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Charleston , SC
Posts: 5,001
Re: Packers OL may be missing a starter on Sunday

I worry about some of the comments that came out of the locker room after the Eagles game. " We got up for this for Donovan" " This win was for the QB ". I never once heard we need to build of this momentum and start winning. If we go 6-10 but go 6-0 in the division it really doesnt get us very far. We have to start winning against the rest of the NFC to get into the playoffs and win this division.

And how could the team not get up to play what most experts say is the best team in the NFC. In my mind the next 3 weeks are statement games. If this team can figure a way out to beat the Pack, The Colts and the Bears all in a row we will have some serious momentum and confindence going into the last half of the year. Of course after those three we get the Lions right before the bye.
__________________
Just win.
artmonkforhallofamein07 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2010, 06:42 AM   #22
skins89moss
Playmaker
 
skins89moss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 3,634
Re: Packers OL may be missing a starter on Sunday

Quote:
Originally Posted by SUNRA View Post
Even better news: New Jersey Star Ledger reported today, that Green Bay will be without LB Nick Barnett, and two starting safeties Morgan Burnett and Nick Collins. There should be no reason why Mcnabb and Co. shouldn't score at will on this secondary.
Please when have the Redskins offense scored at will in the last 4 years?
__________________
www.islandstyleflowers.com Home of the Hawaiian Foam Flowers and Kukui Nut Leis. Great selections and best prices. Redskins Fan Since 1972
skins89moss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2010, 06:46 AM   #23
skins89moss
Playmaker
 
skins89moss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 3,634
Re: Packers OL may be missing a starter on Sunday

The Packers maybe with a few starters on defense which is big but their defense finds a way to force turnovers and score points. Our offense better protect the ball and if we can run the ball I think we will have a good day on offense. Defense we need to stop the Pack from getting big plays and make them have to play from behind where Rogers may press and take chances. Redskins fans at FedEX make some Noise Sunday.
__________________
www.islandstyleflowers.com Home of the Hawaiian Foam Flowers and Kukui Nut Leis. Great selections and best prices. Redskins Fan Since 1972
skins89moss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2010, 11:44 AM   #24
bigmarley4
Special Teams
 
bigmarley4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 219
Re: Packers OL may be missing a starter on Sunday

Quote:
Originally Posted by CultBrennan59 View Post
Keep in mind Aaron Rodgers is great with bad OLines, so losing a RT shouldn't be a game changer for us, especially if Bulaga and Clifton are still there. Now Rodgers or Greg Jennings or Jermichael Finely being out on Offense, or Woodson being out on Defense...thats a different story...
Agreed. J. Finley really scares me. GB will see how we neutralized deep ball to WR's last game and will run TE on seams and cross routes in the middle of the field. Will need pressure plus excellent zone coverage play, and the O will need to put up lots of pts.
bigmarley4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2010, 08:51 PM   #25
Kindoy
The Starter
 
Kindoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Culver City, CA
Posts: 1,013
Re: Packers OL may be missing a starter on Sunday

Chad Clifton is listed as probable and was limited in practice. Crossing my fingers.
__________________
RIP 21
Kindoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2010, 11:04 PM   #26
ethat001
Impact Rookie
 
ethat001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 920
Re: Packers OL may be missing a starter on Sunday

Quote:
Originally Posted by skins89moss View Post
Please when have the Redskins offense scored at will in the last 4 years?
Actually we seemed to score at will in the Houston game (Except when we needed it)... And we seemed to score at will during the first half of most games this season. It's just that after half-time we sucked (I think we're averaging ~3 points total after halftime all season)..

Quote:
Against Dallas:
[not a good offensive game]

Against Houston (first 3 quarters):
15:00 1 05:23 WAS 20 9 57 Field Goal
07:59 1 02:11 WAS 42 5 33 Field Goal
14:56 2 02:27 WAS 27 5 73 Touchdown
10:51 2 02:36 WAS 16 5 23 Punt
02:19 2 00:59 WAS 37 4 63 Touchdown
09:22 3 05:31 WAS 8 9 92 Touchdown

Against Rams (first half): - (admittedly a bad start)
11:31 1 02:02 WAS 28 3 19 Fumble
08:48 1 03:00 WAS 31 3 3 Blocked Punt, Downs
05:39 1 02:15 WAS 15 5 39 Punt
01:48 1 01:58 WAS 36 6 53 Field Goal
14:43 2 00:00 STL 21 1 21 Touchdown
12:31 2 04:54 WAS 17 8 77 Field Goal

Against Eagles (entire first half)
13:12 1 01:09 PHI 39 3 39 Touchdown
09:12 1 04:25 WAS 22 9 78 Touchdown
14:55 2 05:44 WAS 20 11 72 Field Goal
How is it possible we're so bad in the second halves of games? Is it age? Lack of adjustments?
- Moss: 31 years old
- Galloway: almost 39 years old
- Casey Rabach - 33 years old
- Artis Hicks - almost 32 years old
ethat001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 3.48280 seconds with 12 queries