Week 6:Redskins vs. Colts Gameday thread

[Gtothearry]

I didn't like the 3rd and 1 run to the left. We could've got a yard easy on that play and kept driving.

[Beemnseven]

Originally Posted by Gtothearry

I didn't like the 3rd and 1 run to the left. We could've got a yard easy on that play and kept driving.

If you go back and look at it though, Torain had two blockers and a lot of space in front of him. One of their linebackers made a great play to knife behind everybody and stuff it.

The Colts also lined up for a push up the middle in anticipation of a run up the center, so in reality Shanahan actually called the play perfectly. It just wasn't perfectly executed.

[Gtothearry]

Originally Posted by Beemnseven

If you go back and look at it though, Torain had two blockers and a lot of space in front of him. One of their linebackers made a great play to knife behind everybody and stuff it.

The Colts also lined up for a push up the middle in anticipation of a run up the center, so in reality Shanahan actually called the play perfectly. It just wasn't perfectly executed.

When had they stopped us going up the middle? :cheeky-sm 3 feet come on push the d-line back and hit it.

[Beemnseven]

Even with a secondary that can catch interceptions, the offense still has to be able to do something with it. One of the turnovers led to a FG, the other went nowhere.

Look, offensively we're just not there yet. Don't forget, this team has had a stagnant offense since about 2004.

[EARTHQUAKE2689]

Originally Posted by Beemnseven

Even with a secondary that can catch interceptions, the offense still has to be able to do something with it. One of the turnovers led to a FG, the other went nowhere.

Look, offensively we're just not there yet. Don't forget, this team has had a stagnant offense since about 2004.

We had 10 pts off turnovers

[Dirtbag59]

Originally Posted by EARTHQUAKE2689

We had 10 pts off turnovers

[SirClintonPortis]

Originally Posted by EARTHQUAKE2689

We had 10 pts off turnovers

And we could have had more. Learn the difference between optimzing and satisfycing. You fall into the category of the former.

[EARTHQUAKE2689]

Originally Posted by SirClintonPortis

And we could have had more. Learn the difference between optimzing and satisfycing. You fall into the category of the former.

Dude I was just stating a fact. We could of had more, we could of had less. But once again you had to channel Offiss. I don't need to learn anything.

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by EARTHQUAKE2689

Dude I was just stating a fact. We could of had more, we could of had less. But once again you had to channel Offiss. I don't need to learn anything.

Now you see why I said "perhaps" earlier. In the game day thread, just wait a few minutes and another stupid post will come rolling by

[SirClintonPortis]

Originally Posted by EARTHQUAKE2689

Dude I was just stating a fact. We could of had more, we could of had less. But once again you had to channel Offiss. I don't need to learn anything.

In context, it's purpose was clearly to make things less "negative".

[artmonkforhallofamein07]

yep, Gano missed a sure fire FG to hve the game tied.

Wish we would have been a little more aggresive on Offense with the pass. We saw some of that in the fourth.

And yes another foot over the safties head and we win by 4.

[Ruhskins]

Good effort by the team, but there's no "W" to show for so it's just a good effort and that's it. I think this team has a lot of talent and that's what pisses me off the most. If they hold on to those INTs, make better decisions in key situations, and take advantage of turnovers better, they get the "W".

Honestly, we can bitch about Rogers, but I guess it could be worst...he could be giving up passes instead of almost getting INTs.

[Bushead]

Originally Posted by Ruhskins

Good effort by the team, but there's no "W" to show for so it's just a good effort and that's it. I think this team has a lot of talent and that's what pisses me off the most. If they hold on to those INTs, make better decisions in key situations, and take advantage of turnovers better, they get the "W".

Honestly, we can bitch about Rogers, but I guess it could be worst...he could be giving up passes instead of almost getting INTs.

I have no idea how you think this team has a lot of talent. You can' say anything good about the offensive line except TW looks like he'll be great. We have a terrible WR core. Our defensive secondary, LBs, and DL are all thin since the switch in schemes. We are probably stillt he oldest team in the NFL after cutting all those old players.

I think this is an overachieving team, which i'm fine with, but I have no idea how you can say this team has talent compared to other teams.

[skins89moss]

Originally Posted by Bushead

I have no idea how you think this team has a lot of talent. You can' say anything good about the offensive line except TW looks like he'll be great. We have a terrible WR core. Our defensive secondary, LBs, and DL are all thin since the switch in schemes. We are probably stillt he oldest team in the NFL after cutting all those old players.

I think this is an overachieving team, which i'm fine with, but I have no idea how you can say this team has talent compared to other teams.

Every team has talent and we have a few older players like Galloway, Daniels, Holiday, London, which makes our team appear old. we also have some nice young and up in coming players.

[wordsmithgk]

yes we have to be pleased as fans for the team plays hard never gives up and has and are in position to win credit the coaching staff for putting the team in this position we have reason to be optimistic