![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: What hurt us last night, was not having Rocky!
Certainly could have used Rocky out there, even could have used more Perry Riley. Personally, I'm not a big fan of Blades
However...Merriman has played 18 games since 2008 and in 8 of them (nearly half) he had AT MOST 1 tackle in the game. So...
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Norfolk, Va (OV)
Posts: 1,566
|
Re: What hurt us last night, was not having Rocky!
What hurt us last night was McNabb not having Cooley and not trusting Davis.
__________________
'Any NFL team will win with RG3. Imagine how exciting it will be watching him do it.' |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,052
|
Re: What hurt us last night, was not having Rocky!
This guy definitely wants to be in a twosome with VJax and Merriman. I guess booze and roids are attractive to him.
Sheesh, Shanahan DRAFTED Brandon Marshall. He could draft the next big thing at WR, and I'm confident he will because HE HAS AN EYE FOR OFFENSIVE TALENT.
__________________
Analysis using datasets (aka stats) is an attempt at reverse-engineering a player's "goodness". Virtuosity remembered, douchebaggery forgotten. The ideal character profile shoved down modern Western men and women's throats is Don Juan. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,052
|
Re: What hurt us last night, was not having Rocky!
And lol, trashing Rak by comparing him to a roid user. Amazing insight. /sarcasm
__________________
Analysis using datasets (aka stats) is an attempt at reverse-engineering a player's "goodness". Virtuosity remembered, douchebaggery forgotten. The ideal character profile shoved down modern Western men and women's throats is Don Juan. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Springfield,Missouri
Posts: 463
|
Re: What hurt us last night, was not having Rocky!
Quote:
Just telling it like it is... If I get to choose between Rak or the old Merriman..(without knowing about the Roid issues)'m taking the old Merriman.. It's just that simple SirClinton. I love Rak and I hope he's here forever The point I'm trying to make sirportis... How would you like to have 2 Raks on the team? That's what it would be,IF.. IF..merriman goes back to old form. And to get him...? Don't have to trade a pick for him.. Don't have to shoot him up with roids to get him ... Don't even have to give him an Albert Haynesworth 100 Millions dollar Contract to have him.... But you will have to cut a player to get him.... Would you like a list of who? There are some I would cut RIGHT NOW... even not knowing if Merriman can go back to old form... Roydell would start the list...sir clinton Portis... ![]() To not at least consider the option,would be foolish... but then again sir clinton...not everybody has my "amazing insight" lol
__________________
The 1991 Redskins team,is the greatest team of all time. Their average margin of victory is the greatest of all Superbowl winning teams! HTTR!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,052
|
Re: What hurt us last night, was not having Rocky!
Quote:
__________________
Analysis using datasets (aka stats) is an attempt at reverse-engineering a player's "goodness". Virtuosity remembered, douchebaggery forgotten. The ideal character profile shoved down modern Western men and women's throats is Don Juan. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 59
Posts: 21,744
|
Re: What hurt us last night, was not having Rocky!
And another mistake/turnover thing, When Landry got that one fumble from Addai, he should have taken off running for the Endzone, maybe then the Refs wouldn't have blown it dead. I don't know, but the 3 and out after that hurt us too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: What hurt us last night, was not having Rocky!
I saw Landry take off running but the refs blew it dead as he was running
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 328
|
Re: What hurt us last night, was not having Rocky!
Quote:
We did miss Rocky big time. Might be why we stayed Dime more than we should have (that and Peyton telling us we could not sub). Fletcher said earlier in the year, will look for quote, that it is not the 3-4 when we have issues, it is Nickle and Dime when we get blowed up. Not his words. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 59
Posts: 21,744
|
Re: What hurt us last night, was not having Rocky!
Yeah I know, but still ticked that the refs blew it dead, and he didn't take it to the house just for the effect! (would have been just like last week's INT, except this time I don't think he was touched.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Springfield,Missouri
Posts: 463
|
Re: What hurt us last night, was not having Rocky!
Quote:
McNabbs TD called back on Williams holding..Really? (TD called back) Landry's down by contact play after fumble (would have been a TD) Colts wr catches ball...landry drills him on sideline and ball squirts out as he (huge play on long pass)lands...nothing said at all about this
__________________
The 1991 Redskins team,is the greatest team of all time. Their average margin of victory is the greatest of all Superbowl winning teams! HTTR!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
MVP
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 46
Posts: 10,069
|
Re: What hurt us last night, was not having Rocky!
What hurt us was Fat Albert sitting out and getting to watch the game from a luxury box that I assume he didn't have to pay for. Also, our despicable offense not being able to take advantage of every gift the Special Teams and Defensive guys gave them.
__________________
"The Redskins have always suffered from chronic organizational deformities under Snyder." -Jenkins |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,526
|
Re: What hurt us last night, was not having Rocky!
Rocky not being there last night hurt us, but I believe Albert not being out there because he has experience going against the Colts OL. He would have gotten us pressure and a hold or two, for sure.
All these coulda, woulda, shouldas about this game last night, and no one can just flat out say 'we lost to a great team last night, who has a hall of fame QB that makes great secondarys look shaky'
__________________
"Anyones better than Madieu Williams" |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 59
Posts: 21,744
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,052
|
Re: What hurt us last night, was not having Rocky!
Better than Blache, of course. Then again, Blache was so bad this isn't saying much.
__________________
Analysis using datasets (aka stats) is an attempt at reverse-engineering a player's "goodness". Virtuosity remembered, douchebaggery forgotten. The ideal character profile shoved down modern Western men and women's throats is Don Juan. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|