To All The Liberals

[firstdown]

Originally Posted by Mattyk

damn you've got me wanting to drop what I'm doing and pack my bags right now

I was thinking the same thing.

[GMScud]

Originally Posted by Mattyk

I need to move to SD, not for the weed necessarily, the weather there is insane isn't it?

I really need to get out there- for the weed and everything else. My wife and I decided our next big vacation (probably not until next summer) is going to be California. Spend a week in wine country and finish it up with a few days in SD.

About 10 years ago my dad had a business trip that kept him in SD for almost two weeks. He had never been there before, but ever since that trip, he and my stepmom have gone back to SD every single year for a little r&r. He says it's his favorite place in the USA.

[MTK]

Originally Posted by GMScud

I really need to get out there- for the weed and everything else. My wife and I decided our next big vacation (probably not until next summer) is going to be California. Spend a week in wine country and finish it up with a few days in SD.

About 10 years ago my dad had a business trip that kept him in SD for almost two weeks. He had never been there before, but ever since that trip, he and my stepmom have gone back to SD every single year for a little r&r. He says it's his favorite place in the USA.

Cali is definitely on our list for vacation spots. It would be fun to do 2 weeks out there, hit San Fran, wine country, San Diego, etc. We kicked around the idea of doing it this year, but instead went for several small vacations instead. Heading back to New Orleans tomorrow for a long weekend!

[CRedskinsRule]

Dang it I was planning on going to India tomorrow:

The Economic Times reported last week that the administration has booked the entire Taj Mahal hotel - all 570 rooms - for the duration of the visit, which is expected to last just two days. Dozens of other rooms have been reserved in other hotels, the report said.

[FRPLG]

What all the liberals on here fail to realize is that Obama did not get elected based on his legislative agenda. That stuff appeals to you and his undeniable success in enacting it fools you into believing he did what he said he was going to do because that is the stuff you care about. He did a damn fine job of getting legislation through that you all like. What he didn't do. What he has failed so miserably at is what he promised he would do when he got elected. HOPE AND CHANGE. That is a much bigger idea. Spin it however you want tonight is an affirmation that his HOPE AND CHANGE mantra was what got him elected. People are tired of all of them...they think the system doesn't work. BO promised to come and fix that. He hasn't even tried. So tonight that part of his agenda, the most important part, he was held accountable for. The Pubs will come in and do nothing to fix it and we'll be back here again in two years. Rinse repeat.

[saden1]

Originally Posted by FRPLG

What all the liberals on here fail to realize is that Obama did not get elected based on his legislative agenda. That stuff appeals to you and his undeniable success in enacting it fools you into believing he did what he said he was going to do because that is the stuff you care about. He did a damn fine job of getting legislation through that you all like. What he didn't do. What he has failed so miserably at is what he promised he would do when he got elected. HOPE AND CHANGE. That is a much bigger idea. Spin it however you want tonight is an affirmation that his HOPE AND CHANGE mantra was what got him elected. People are tired of all of them...they think the system doesn't work. BO promised to come and fix that. He hasn't even tried. So tonight that part of his agenda, the most important part, he was held accountable for. The Pubs will come in and do nothing to fix it and we'll be back here again in two years. Rinse repeat.

Hold your horses until 2012...he wasn't running in this election.

[Monkeydad]

Originally Posted by saden1

Hold your horses until 2012...he wasn't running in this election.

So hilarious.


So 2006's election WAS a referendum against President Bush, but the midterm election for President Messiah isn't? :cheeky-sm

Midterm elections are ALWAYS about the President.


This election was COMPLETELY about President Obama and his agenda. It's been rejected. Not just turned down...it's been balled up, lit on fire and flushed down the toilet.

[saden1]

Originally Posted by Buster

So hilarious.


So 2006's election WAS a referendum against President Bush, but the midterm election for President Messiah isn't? :cheeky-sm

Midterm elections are ALWAYS about the President.


This election was COMPLETELY about President Obama and his agenda. It's been rejected. Not just turned down...it's been balled up, lit on fire and flushed down the toilet.

Good, he should lose in 2012 then and you will get to dance on the streets.

[Monkeydad]

Originally Posted by saden1

Good, he should lose in 2012 then and you will get to dance on the streets.

He will.


In fact, Hillary could pose a challenge to him. He's THAT bad of a President that he might not even win his party's nomination. Sitting Presidents are not normally challenged, but this President is uniquely bad at his job.

By the way, the Senate will swing in 2012 also. Last night was only the beginning.

[firstdown]

Originally Posted by saden1

Hold your horses until 2012...he wasn't running in this election.

I'd say he was running in this race in one form or the other. Now he is just running to India to the tune of 200 million per day on the tax payers. What is getting left out is the governors that the Rep. picked up because redistricting is coming up soon. I don't like how the do redistricting but its what the dems wanted so its their game the gonvernors will be playing.

[mlmpetert]

Originally Posted by firstdown

I'd say he was running in this race in one form or the other. Now he is just running to India to the tune of 200 million per day on the tax payers.

Maybe it costs so much because he's going to a teleprompter for the first time ever in India's Central Hall of Parliament?

Teleprompter to make its debut in Parliament when Obama speaks - India - DNA

[saden1]

Originally Posted by firstdown

I'd say he was running in this race in one form or the other. Now he is just running to India to the tune of 200 million per day on the tax payers.

So did Harry Ried win because he campaigned for him and Russ Feingold lost because he campaigned for him?

You really are an idiot if you think 200 million dollars are being spent a day. Perhaps they're Indian Rupees?

[Monkeydad]

Originally Posted by saden1

So did Harry Ried win because he campaigned for him and Russ Feingold lost because he campaigned for him?

You really are an idiot if you think 200 million dollars are being spent a day.

The libs are so bitter and pessimistic today. Calling names, insulting...oh wait...that's nothing new.


You REALLY doubt First Lady Obama can spend that much? :cheeky-sm

[firstdown]

Originally Posted by saden1

So did Harry Ried win because he campaigned for him and Russ Feingold lost because he campaigned for him?

You really are an idiot if you think 200 million dollars are being spent a day.

I really no nothing about the people who ran against Reid or Feingold so I could not say why one won and one lost. Yea I'm an idiot I guess.

[GMScud]

Originally Posted by saden1

So did Harry Ried win because he campaigned for him and Russ Feingold lost because he campaigned for him?

You really are an idiot if you think 200 million dollars are being spent a day. Perhaps they're Indian Rupees?

Harry Reid won because the unions bussed in as many votes as possible. They're intimidators. Casino Bosses stood to loose a fortune if Angle got elected.