USA Today Gibbs Articles- Skins staying put at #5??

cpayne5 · 04-16-2004, 04:13 PM

Haha, maybe. We'd basically be giving them the core of a team. We'd be like $15million under the cap with that deal.

I do like the Samuels/Gardner for #1. I would definitely not give up the #5 just to move up a couple spots. If we get rid of #60 for gallery, gallery would come in with a more cap friendly contract that would probably give us about $5million extra room under the cap.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

04-16-2004, 04:13 PM	#16
cpayne5 Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 3,807	Haha, maybe. We'd basically be giving them the core of a team. We'd be like $15million under the cap with that deal. I do like the Samuels/Gardner for #1. I would definitely not give up the #5 just to move up a couple spots. If we get rid of #60 for gallery, gallery would come in with a more cap friendly contract that would probably give us about $5million extra room under the cap.

USA Today Gibbs Articles- Skins staying put at #5??

Locker Room Main Forum