Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


LOL @ Redskins

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-16-2010, 07:56 PM   #1
skinsfaninok
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
skinsfaninok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UNITED STATES
Age: 39
Posts: 36,242
Re: LOL @ Redskins

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
By the way did anyone else see TO's tweet about Donovan's contract?

T.O. claims his brother posted the anti-Donovan Twitter message | ProFootballTalk

Or his brother's tweet, as TO claimed

Donovan had a good response though. Bengals are 2-7, or something like that, so who's he to talk
People wonder why guys like Moss and Owens will never win a SB? This is why, Cancers in the locker room almost never succeed, which is why AH will be cut after the season
__________________
“Mediocre people don’t like high achievers, and high achievers don’t like mediocre people.”
― Nick Saban
skinsfaninok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2010, 10:03 PM   #2
EARTHQUAKE2689
You did WHAT?!?
 
EARTHQUAKE2689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna.
Age: 37
Posts: 14,189
Re: LOL @ Redskins

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfaninok View Post
People wonder why guys like Moss and Owens will never win a SB? This is why, Cancers in the locker room almost never succeed, which is why AH will be cut after the season
Y would you steal my avatar
__________________
https://open.spotify.com/artist/1NG9zNxqMP8cYNP72QqUQT

Shameless self-promotion. It is what it is.
EARTHQUAKE2689 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2010, 12:11 AM   #3
Dirtbag59
Naega jeil jal naga
 
Dirtbag59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 40
Posts: 14,750
Re: LOL @ Redskins

Quote:
Originally Posted by EARTHQUAKE2689 View Post
Y would you steal my avatar
Thats the beauty of the parrot. People have to go out of their way to steal your avatar.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice."
- Scooter

"I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now."
- FRPLG
Dirtbag59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2010, 12:13 AM   #4
DynamiteRave
Living Legend
 
DynamiteRave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Washington DC
Age: 39
Posts: 16,867
Re: LOL @ Redskins

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirtbag359 View Post
Thats the beauty of the parrot. People have to go out of their way to steal your avatar.
I'm still reppin Pineapple Jesus till the day the site shuts down. (if that ever happens)
__________________
Establishment, establishment, you always know what's best.

I've been a part of this message board for 17 years. Damn I'm old.
DynamiteRave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2010, 12:26 AM   #5
Dirtbag59
Naega jeil jal naga
 
Dirtbag59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 40
Posts: 14,750
Re: LOL @ Redskins

Quote:
Originally Posted by DynamiteRave View Post
I'm still reppin Pineapple Jesus till the day the site shuts down. (if that ever happens)
It will eventually, hopefully later rather than sooner. Probably when forums become obsolete and some different trend takes over the net.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice."
- Scooter

"I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now."
- FRPLG
Dirtbag59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2010, 12:31 AM   #6
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,379
Re: LOL @ Redskins

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirtbag359 View Post
It will eventually, hopefully later rather than sooner. Probably when forums become obsolete and some different trend takes over the net.
3D forums? Virtual reality threads? Hehehe
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2010, 12:34 AM   #7
Dirtbag59
Naega jeil jal naga
 
Dirtbag59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 40
Posts: 14,750
Re: LOL @ Redskins

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruhskins View Post
3D forums? Virtual reality threads? Hehehe
If I knew what it was I wouldn't be sitting here talking to you guys. Well maybe talking to you guys, from my penthouse suite at the Bellagio.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice."
- Scooter

"I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now."
- FRPLG
Dirtbag59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2010, 01:02 AM   #8
CrazyCanuck
Serenity Now
 
CrazyCanuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,008
Re: LOL @ Redskins

The Eagles would have beaten any team in the NFL by at least 10 points last night IMO. Vick was that good, it was QB perfection. In fact if someone can find a video of a bad play he made last night I'd love to see it cuz I don't remember a single one. That being said...

Sorry to but I can't help but question the 3-4 again. I think 90% here agree the current roster is much better suited for the 4-3. I just picture a DL of Carter, Orakpo, LoAx, and a MOTIVATED AH. Plus the first three guys are athletic enough that we could use a lot of "exotic looks" with the DLs dropping back into coverage etc.

Another problem I see with the 3-4 is its complexity. I'm no X O expert but what I like about the 3-4 is all the different looks you can show at the line. It can make things very confusing for the opposing offense. The flip side is that it can also be confusing for the defense. Guys are switching positions and assignments from play to play and you really need some cerebral guys out there who know what the hell is going on, otherwise a good offense will make you run around like chickens. Unfortunately Fletcher is the only guy with a brain on this D (maybe Rak and Los too), and Hall and Landry ain't winning a Nobel Prize in physics anytime soon.

Maybe it just takes time/players like others keep saying (I sure hope so). But couldn't we have started with a 4-3 and transitioned to a 3-4 as the right players were added? Plus where are we getting all these players from? We need 4 OLs at least!

Whatever... rant over.
CrazyCanuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2010, 12:17 PM   #9
Longtimefan
Playmaker
 
Longtimefan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Germantown, Md.
Posts: 4,832
Re: LOL @ Redskins

Quote:
Originally Posted by CrazyCanuck View Post
The Eagles would have beaten any team in the NFL by at least 10 points last night IMO. Vick was that good, it was QB perfection. In fact if someone can find a video of a bad play he made last night I'd love to see it cuz I don't remember a single one. That being said...

Sorry to but I can't help but question the 3-4 again. I think 90% here agree the current roster is much better suited for the 4-3. I just picture a DL of Carter, Orakpo, LoAx, and a MOTIVATED AH. Plus the first three guys are athletic enough that we could use a lot of "exotic looks" with the DLs dropping back into coverage etc.

Another problem I see with the 3-4 is its complexity. I'm no X O expert but what I like about the 3-4 is all the different looks you can show at the line. It can make things very confusing for the opposing offense. The flip side is that it can also be confusing for the defense. Guys are switching positions and assignments from play to play and you really need some cerebral guys out there who know what the hell is going on, otherwise a good offense will make you run around like chickens. Unfortunately Fletcher is the only guy with a brain on this D (maybe Rak and Los too), and Hall and Landry ain't winning a Nobel Prize in physics anytime soon.

Maybe it just takes time/players like others keep saying (I sure hope so). But couldn't we have started with a 4-3 and transitioned to a 3-4 as the right players were added? Plus where are we getting all these players from? We need 4 OLs at least!

Whatever... rant over.
CC your rant would have to go some to rival that of Chad Dukes yesterday, even LaVar was lost for words. Phillip Daniels even took time to weigh-in with a response.
__________________
A revolution is coming and it will be televised.
Longtimefan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2010, 12:54 PM   #10
mredskins
Gamebreaker
 
mredskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 13,232
Re: LOL @ Redskins

Quote:
Originally Posted by Longtimefan View Post
CC your rant would have to go some to rival that of Chad Dukes yesterday, even LaVar was lost for words. Phillip Daniels even took time to weigh-in with a response.

Seriously why do folks listen to chad dukes? He knows as much about sports as my mom. The guy is a loser I don't care what he says.

He is just there to give color for Lavar, even when Chad was with the Junkies he hardly talked about Sports, it was always his self loathing comedy.
__________________
When life gives you paper jams, turn them into paper footballs!
mredskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2010, 12:59 PM   #11
MTK
Hail Raiser
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,048
Re: LOL @ Redskins

Quote:
Originally Posted by mredskins View Post
Seriously why do folks listen to chad dukes? He knows as much about sports as my mom. The guy is a loser I don't care what he says.

He is just there to give color for Lavar, even when Chad was with the Junkies he hardly talked about Sports, it was always his self loathing comedy.
I just don't get it either. Blowhard radio like that just doesn't appeal to me in the least bit. I know some think that's keeping it real. I agree to a point, it's keeping it real... as in real dumb.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2010, 10:20 PM   #12
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,379
Re: LOL @ Redskins

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfaninok View Post
People wonder why guys like Moss and Owens will never win a SB? This is why, Cancers in the locker room almost never succeed, which is why AH will be cut after the season
I don't think TO's or Moss' teams lost the SB because they were locker room cancers. Honestly, AH being a so called "cancer" is the least of our team's concern right now.
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.90716 seconds with 11 queries