2011 NFL Draft

[freddyg12]

Originally Posted by Dirtbag59

I can understand hyping him up this offseason. Last offseason though, not so much.




I get your concern, especially since I have it to, but I think we weigh competition levels way more then we should. A lot of people don't realize that a lot of quality football players are going to these mid major programs like Boise State, Fresno State, and even Nevada. In fact Fresno State's coach has an anybody, anytime, anywhere policy when it comes to scheduling yet they get turned down constantly because college football is a "year long playoff" that lets you choose who you want to play and most schools across the country would rather play FCS schools then mid majors like Fresno.



We're also in a day and age where we've seen Appalachian State beat Michigan in Ann Arbor. Boise State beating Oklahoma in a BcS bowl game. Joe Flacco is among the best young QB's in the game despite playing at an FCS school.

Anyway the point of all this soapbox ranting is the possibility (not the fact) that someone like Kaepernick was overlooked when he was 17 or 18 by the major schools and in 4 years at Nevada has taken his physical skill set and turned himself into a quality QB. If that's so then the strength of schedule should be an afterthought. At the very least he has intangibles that coaches love. Maybe not as good as Tebow but at least in the same ballpark.

Either way I won't know how I truly feel about Kaepernick (and Dalton/Ponder/Stanzi) until draft day. If Shanahan or some other QB guru takes him then thats a pretty good indication that he could turn into the real deal.

Good points. This is nothing new for pro scouts either. Our beloved teams of the 80s & the 49ers were known for finding diamonds in the rough of small school teams, before the term "mid majors" was even used. Darrell Green & Jerry Rice to name a couple HOFers e.g.

[CultBrennan59]

I would respect Kaepernicks game more if he did these great numbers against a conference that was good, not the WAC, you know who also put great numbers against the WAC..Pineapple Jesus. On a similar note who was the last good WAC QB in the NFL?

[SkinzWin]

Originally Posted by CultBrennan59

I would respect Kaepernicks game more if he did these great numbers against a conference that was good, not the WAC, you know who also put great numbers against the WAC..Pineapple Jesus. On a similar note who was the last good WAC QB in the NFL?

I would refute this point but it has already been done for me by others. I don't think that you can respect a player less automatically just because he has not played in a power conference. My case in point. Let's compare Cam Newton to Kaepernick...

Cam Newton: 6'6' 250 lbs. Backup at Florida. Transfers to Binn College (JUCO). Transfers to Auburn for one season. Newton is a physical freak. He can run and extend the play and his stats this season were exceptionally good. 66.1% Completion Percentage. 2854 Yards. 30 TD. 7 INT. He has a history of academic cheating, and stealing. Seen as a head case with a big star mentality. Newton's knock besides this is that he had one year as a starter in a major college football setting.


Colin Kaepernick: 6'6' 225 lbs. 4 year starter out of Nevada. Most statistical numbers improved each of his four year. 64.9% Completion Percentage. 3022 Yards. 21 TD. 8 INT. Kaepernick has had four years to improve, and has, and while he is not as much of a physical freak as Newton, he has a ton of intangibles and upside, maybe more than anyone else, without the apparent headaches of premadonnaism and inflated egos that come with someone like Newton.

My point is this. Is Kaepernick as good as Newton? No. I think he could be and he has shown steady improvement. Is the ceiling higher for Newton? Probably, but it also could be a lot closer for Newton being a screw up IMO. If a guy like this had these similar skill and intangibles that people seem to covet, why take the risk on the ego of someone like Newton, when you can get virtually the same package at a lower cost?

Just because Newton went to Auburn and Kaepernick went to Nevada doesn't mean Newton is a hugely more talented player (albeit I will concede I think he does have more raw talent than Kaepernick). It simply means that scouts didn't see him like they did Newton. The tables could be turned and Kaepernick could have been recruited by a power conference. Their numbers are very similar statistically. I think as others have said, too many people take too much into account when looking at what conference a player was in and what teams they played against, instead of their athletic ability and skill sets.

Sincerely,
The KaepKrusader

[MTK]

You can't really compare guys like Namath and Bradshaw to today's standards. Different game back then, different rules, and the 16 game season didn't start until 1978. Look at any of the greats prior to 1980 or so and their numbers aren't all that impressive when compared to today's QBs.

[Dirtbag59]

Interesting tidbit about this years draft. Without a CBA teams aren't allowed to trade next years picks.

[freddyg12]

Originally Posted by Dirtbag59

Interesting tidbit about this years draft. Without a CBA teams aren't allowed to trade next years picks.

Great news! We're assured of having at least 8 picks next year, assuming there is a draft in 2012.

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by Dirtbag59

Interesting tidbit about this years draft. Without a CBA teams aren't allowed to trade next years picks.

Didn't we talk about that last week? Anyhow, yeah that certainly will impact what we can and can't do

[skinsfaninok]

^ I just saw that also, sucks

[GTripp0012]

Still waiting to get fired up about this draft. I haven't really been in the loop...because I haven't really tried to be.

Could we hit April before I catch draft fever? Possibly.

[freddyg12]

Originally Posted by GTripp0012

Still waiting to get fired up about this draft. I haven't really been in the loop...because I haven't really tried to be.

Could we hit April before I catch draft fever? Possibly.

I'm so ready for this draft, but I always am.

[freddyg12]

Originally Posted by GTripp0012

Still waiting to get fired up about this draft. I haven't really been in the loop...because I haven't really tried to be.

Could we hit April before I catch draft fever? Possibly.

GT, sure you have an opinion about Cory L. playing center as was mentioned earlier?

[GTripp0012]

NFL announces 32 compensatory picks - CBSSports.com

We pick up another 7th in compensation. Not because we lost anybody, but because no one really lost anybody and they have to give out 32 of these things, so, yeah.

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by GTripp0012

NFL announces 32 compensatory picks - CBSSports.com

We pick up another 7th in compensation. Not because we lost anybody, but because no one really lost anybody and they have to give out 32 of these things, so, yeah.

And it looks like we get a 7th from Indy for Tryon. I had thought it might be a 6th

[freddyg12]

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

And it looks like we get a 7th from Indy for Tryon. I had thought it might be a 6th

I was thinking we had 7 picks before this w/2 in 5th & 2 in 6th.
So do we now have 8 picks - 1,2, 5th,5th, 6th, 7th, 7th, 7th?

Or is that Tryon pick in addition to the 2 6ths we have?

[skinster]

Originally Posted by GTripp0012

NFL announces 32 compensatory picks - CBSSports.com

We pick up another 7th in compensation. Not because we lost anybody, but because no one really lost anybody and they have to give out 32 of these things, so, yeah.

I'm very confused about how this works. I thought it was some formula with the net free agents lost (money wise) matched up with free agents brought in.

Arizona lost Dansby Rolle Berry (and sort of Warner). Dansby and Rolle were two of the biggest FA's available. All they signed was Joey Porter.

Why does arizona have one pick and its the 6th from last in the 7th?