Mike vs. Kyle

[skinsfaninok]

Kyle is a good Coord. Our problem is personnel, no true Run game and very avg. WRs will hurt any team.

[Dirtbag59]

Originally Posted by skinsfaninok

Kyle is a good Coord. Our problem is personnel, no true Run game and very avg. WRs will hurt any team.

Does anyone know how many Int's this year should be credited to poor reciever play. I don't know if it was an exaggeration but I've heard that Galloway alone is responsible for 3 or 4. With Santana today it's at least around 4 or 5. Maybe the NFL should start using a receiver rating that gives receivers a TD:INT ratio.

We probably look at yards way to often without looking at how many passes they catch that are thrown their way. Not unlike NBA fans that look at PPG stats while ignoring field goal percentage. Then again maybe stats are overrated to begin with.

[SirClintonPortis]

Originally Posted by Dirtbag359

We probably look at yards way to often without looking at how many passes they catch that are thrown their way. Not unlike NBA fans that look at PPG stats while ignoring field goal percentage. Then again maybe stats are overrated to begin with.

Stats are pretty much "lossy compressed data" designed to approximate what was physical performed in the game. However, unlike ripping music files, stats can horribly mislead(aka change the actual notes played)

[LavaRnChad]

I was happy when we got Kyle but I knew we didn't have the talent on offense that He had with Houston, especially at WR. I wasn't too keen on us hiring Mike because I've heard from a couple of Bronco fans I've chatted with about his "ego power trips" which have been validated here. Frankly I think he is overrated.

[NC_Skins]

Originally Posted by skinsfaninok

Kyle is a good Coord. Our problem is personnel, no true Run game and very avg. WRs will hurt any team.

You can end the thread right here. It's obvious he can do the job, just look at his tenure in Houston with a real QB/WR/TE combo to see that.