Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Giants v. Redskins Gameday Thread

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-03-2011, 08:09 AM   #1
CrustyRedskin
Playmaker
 
CrustyRedskin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: RatherbeinDC, TX
Posts: 3,062
Re: Giants v. Redskins Gameday Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfan69 View Post
Yeah but that's the problem. You can't go anywhere unless you beat the teams in your division. And going into next year I still see us behind all those teams.
Unless your the Raiders!! THey went 6-0 in their division and didnt make the playoffs!!! Thats insane!!!
__________________
Lafayette, we're here.

HTTR. You wern't a bunch of losers on 10-27-14.
CrustyRedskin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2011, 08:02 PM   #2
skins89moss
Playmaker
 
skins89moss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 3,634
Re: Giants v. Redskins Gameday Thread

To all the real Redskins fans peace and God Bless in 2011 I will be watching the few bowl games that remain and keep a eye on the mock drafts. Im out time to do something more productive then sit here and go back and forth with some unhappy fans.HTTR
__________________
www.islandstyleflowers.com Home of the Hawaiian Foam Flowers and Kukui Nut Leis. Great selections and best prices. Redskins Fan Since 1972
skins89moss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2011, 08:05 PM   #3
sdskinsfan2001
Living Legend
 
sdskinsfan2001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Hanahan, South Carolina
Age: 42
Posts: 20,849
Re: Giants v. Redskins Gameday Thread

Moss, Armstrong, Austin, Kelly, Banks, Cooley, Davis is a solid group of pass catchers. We have much bigger needs than those positions. Think we all agree that we need to improve the interior of our o-line and hope that Brown can get healty during the offseason to play RT. On defense we need an outside linebacker opposite of Orakpo, a FS or CB depending on where Barnes starts next season and depth for the D-line. (he should). Bryant and Carriker should stay.
sdskinsfan2001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2011, 08:20 PM   #4
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Giants v. Redskins Gameday Thread

I was very impressed with Austin's route running in preseason, and these past two games. He has pleasantly surprised me. I think he will be a more complete player than Armstrong.

But three 800 yard receivers, first time since 89. Not bad
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2011, 08:34 PM   #5
Chico23231
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
Chico23231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 35,307
Re: Giants v. Redskins Gameday Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
I was very impressed with Austin's route running in preseason, and these past two games. He has pleasantly surprised me. I think he will be a more complete player than Armstrong.

But three 800 yard receivers, first time since 89. Not bad
Yeah, I still think both could be very nice number 3s. What impressed me was Santana fitting nicely into Kyle scheme. Really nice season, needs to get an extention and put back in the slot. Armstrong impressed me as a legit deep threat. He was very consistent long range.

I still like to see us sign a number 1 guy or maybe draft a WR...love AJ Green with our first pick.

Out of our guys we dont have a "redzone" reciever...could Kelly emerge as that guy? He could be wildcard.
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler

He Gets Us
Chico23231 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2011, 08:38 PM   #6
Paintrain
Pro Bowl
 
Paintrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 55
Posts: 5,006
Re: Giants v. Redskins Gameday Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
I was very impressed with Austin's route running in preseason, and these past two games. He has pleasantly surprised me. I think he will be a more complete player than Armstrong.

But three 800 yard receivers, first time since 89. Not bad
Despite questions about him giving up too soon on the run in close games and 3rd down conversion percentages, one thing is clear. Kyle's offense CAN work for the Redskins. For the first time in YEARS I'm comfortable with the scheme and playcaller. We obviously need a QB, a big WR and to shore up the interior of our OL but I like the direction we are moving towards.
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom
1981-2014

I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life!

Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier
Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman
Paintrain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2011, 09:23 PM   #7
tryfuhl
Gamebreaker
 
tryfuhl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 42
Posts: 12,514
Re: Giants v. Redskins Gameday Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
I was very impressed with Austin's route running in preseason, and these past two games. He has pleasantly surprised me. I think he will be a more complete player than Armstrong.

But three 800 yard receivers, first time since 89. Not bad
I think that Austin can become what we wanted Randle El to be.
tryfuhl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2011, 02:02 AM   #8
mooby
Hug Anne Spyder
 
mooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,596
Re: Giants v. Redskins Gameday Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
I was very impressed with Austin's route running in preseason, and these past two games. He has pleasantly surprised me. I think he will be a more complete player than Armstrong.

But three 800 yard receivers, first time since 89. Not bad
But clearly we need an upgrade at receiver, none of them are elite. Even though Santana Moss had 93 receptions for 1115 yards and 6 touchdowns, clearly he's not a #1 wideout. And even though Anthony Armstrong had almost 900 yards receiving on 40+ receptions while being stuck behind Old Man Galloway for the early part of the season, clearly he's not #2 wideout material. Who needs consistency when you can have playmakers?
__________________
Hail to the Football Team
mooby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2011, 08:55 AM   #9
MTK
Hail Raiser
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,038
Re: Giants v. Redskins Gameday Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by mooby View Post
But clearly we need an upgrade at receiver, none of them are elite. Even though Santana Moss had 93 receptions for 1115 yards and 6 touchdowns, clearly he's not a #1 wideout. And even though Anthony Armstrong had almost 900 yards receiving on 40+ receptions while being stuck behind Old Man Galloway for the early part of the season, clearly he's not #2 wideout material. Who needs consistency when you can have playmakers?
I actually feel good about our WR group, can't remember the last time I said that. Moss needs to be a priority to be re-signed I believe. At the worst he's a great slot guy, so even if you go after one of the big names Moss can still have a big role here. Armstrong is a legit deep threat, and Austin could be a nice role player. Kelly is obviously the big unknown.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2011, 09:40 AM   #10
mooby
Hug Anne Spyder
 
mooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,596
Re: Giants v. Redskins Gameday Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
I actually feel good about our WR group, can't remember the last time I said that. Moss needs to be a priority to be re-signed I believe. At the worst he's a great slot guy, so even if you go after one of the big names Moss can still have a big role here. Armstrong is a legit deep threat, and Austin could be a nice role player. Kelly is obviously the big unknown.
Yeah same here, I was just mocking the people on this board that think our wideouts suck. And Moss def. needs to be resigned, it's like the FOX announcers said, you only let him go if you have a plan/good option to replace him with, and I don't see it this year in free agency. Between Moss/Armstrong/Cooley, I think they are all dependable and we've got wildcards in Austin/Kelly/Banks. If we went into next year with the same wr corps I wouldn't be disappointed, esp. with have bigger positions of need across the board.
__________________
Hail to the Football Team
mooby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2011, 06:35 PM   #11
tryfuhl
Gamebreaker
 
tryfuhl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 42
Posts: 12,514
Re: Giants v. Redskins Gameday Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by mooby View Post
Yeah same here, I was just mocking the people on this board that think our wideouts suck. And Moss def. needs to be resigned, it's like the FOX announcers said, you only let him go if you have a plan/good option to replace him with, and I don't see it this year in free agency. Between Moss/Armstrong/Cooley, I think they are all dependable and we've got wildcards in Austin/Kelly/Banks. If we went into next year with the same wr corps I wouldn't be disappointed, esp. with have bigger positions of need across the board.
Yeah, before the season I wasn't really worried about re-signing Moss. When he started talking about they told him they'd use him in more ways and Andre Johnson told him that's something that Kyle will do and it'll open him up a lot I got a little excited. His performance this year definitely showed he's still got some game in him, did you see him actually TRYING to gain extra yards yesterday? First time in awhile.
tryfuhl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2011, 11:48 AM   #12
Chico23231
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
Chico23231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 35,307
Re: Giants v. Redskins Gameday Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
I actually feel good about our WR group, can't remember the last time I said that. Moss needs to be a priority to be re-signed I believe. At the worst he's a great slot guy, so even if you go after one of the big names Moss can still have a big role here. Armstrong is a legit deep threat, and Austin could be a nice role player. Kelly is obviously the big unknown.
I feel ok...I would love to see Vincent Jackson or AJ Green lined up as the number 1, across from Armstrong with Santana in the slot. A healthy Kelly as a 4 coming in some packages. And coach up Austin/Banks at the 5.
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler

He Gets Us
Chico23231 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2011, 01:45 PM   #13
TheMalcolmConnection
I like big (_|_)s.
 
TheMalcolmConnection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Age: 44
Posts: 19,264
Re: Giants v. Redskins Gameday Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by mooby View Post
But clearly we need an upgrade at receiver, none of them are elite. Even though Santana Moss had 93 receptions for 1115 yards and 6 touchdowns, clearly he's not a #1 wideout. And even though Anthony Armstrong had almost 900 yards receiving on 40+ receptions while being stuck behind Old Man Galloway for the early part of the season, clearly he's not #2 wideout material. Who needs consistency when you can have playmakers?
Aside from the occasional case of the dropsies, it seems to me that our receivers aren't the problem so much as the QB not having time to throw the ball. Granted, there are a few coverage sacks, but overall it seems like we get separation.

We might not have a Fitzgerald to throw a jump ball to, but we have a lot of guys who can run after the catch which is all you can really ask in the WCO.
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.
TheMalcolmConnection is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2011, 01:52 PM   #14
sportscurmudgeon
Playmaker
 
sportscurmudgeon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,159
Re: Giants v. Redskins Gameday Thread

The season is over and out comes "revisionist history" brought to you by Rosie Scenario.

The WRs on the 2010 Washington Redskins are sub-standard by NFL standards. Santana Moss is good - - but hardly excellent. All of the others - - and I do mean ALL of the others - - have that thing called "potential" which really means they have not yet proven that they are any good. Think about the really good WRs in the NFL. How many of them get rave reviews because of their "potential"? None of them do - - because they have shown that they are really good and are not pretenting to be someone about to become really good.

The Skins have bigger needs than WR for next year; that is for sure. But this group of WRs is mediocre and nothing more. That is how it has been for about 5 years now and that is how it will stand until and unless new blood is added to the mix.
__________________
The Sports Curmudgeon
www.sportscurmudgeon.com
But don't get me wrong, I love sports...
sportscurmudgeon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2011, 08:25 PM   #15
Nomad
Registered User
 
Nomad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 518
Re: Giants v. Redskins Gameday Thread

Finally over........ now, after all the up roar over Shanny, this is how I feel, Shanny, made the team about him, I like him, but our off season was spent of Haynesworth, then him and his son went after D.McNabb, then the defense went from top 5 to last in the league......... we digressed big time, next year, I wouldnt have large expectations, until, we make it about the whole organization.......... we will continue to spiral down.
Nomad is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.35811 seconds with 11 queries