Skins have 10th overall selection. Who do we pick?

[Bucket]

Originally Posted by skinsfaninok

He had to have meant trade for NE late round pick in the 1st. Or their 17th pick from Oak

I meant what I said. if we can get two more picks for our first round in early rounds to add depth to our team, then why not?

I would rather get more picks and more players with talent. We don't have any picks after the 2nd till the late rounds. Why not try to beef up our middle rounds for more qaulity picks?

We are in a rebuilding phase. If we were 10-6 last year I would say go for the 10th overall pick and see what we can get. Although, we have a old dieng roster that needs to be rebuilt. Including the the middle of our Oline, and Dline.

You can't win football games if you cannot control the line of scrimmage. We failed to do that in ALOT of games this year.

[wilsowilso]

Originally Posted by Bucket

I meant what I said. if we can get two more picks for our first round in early rounds to add depth to our team, then why not?.

Hey genius. Look up the word VALUE in the dictionary.

Suggesting that we trade the number 10 pick in the draft for a second and third round pick is a clown shoes idea.

It's hardly even worth responding to because it is such an absurd comment.

[Lotus]

Originally Posted by wilsowilso

Hey genius. Look up the word VALUE in the dictionary.

Suggesting that we trade the number 10 pick in the draft for a second and third round pick is a clown shoes idea.

It's hardly even worth responding to because it is such an absurd comment.

According to the standard draft value chart here, the #10 pick would be worth the first two picks of the second round plus a mid-round pick from the third round.

So, yes, we should get more than a #2 and a #3 for our pick at 10.

[Bucket]

Originally Posted by Lotus

According to the standard draft value chart here, the #10 pick would be worth the first two picks of the second round plus a mid-round pick from the third round.

So, yes, we should get more than a #2 and a #3 for our pick at 10.

I believe NE has 2 2nd round picks correct? So we would obtain their 2 2nd round picks, and their 3rd... How is that not value?

Maybe I made a typo on my original comment. I'm to lazy to go back a few pages and check though..

[wilsowilso]

Originally Posted by Bucket

I believe NE has 2 2nd round picks correct? So we would obtain their 2 2nd round picks, and their 3rd... How is that not value?

Maybe I made a typo on my original comment. I'm to lazy to go back a few pages and check though..

I like the idea of trading back as well.

Just thought you were leaving out a second 2nd round pick for no apparent reason.

Three good picks for the #10 overall makes much more sense.

[Ruhskins]

Originally Posted by wilsowilso

I like the idea of trading back as well.

Just thought you were leaving out a second 2nd round pick for no apparent reason.

Three good picks for the #10 overall makes much more sense.

I would like scenario where we drop to the middle/bottom of the first round and pick up Pouncey.

[SFREDSKIN]

Originally Posted by Bucket

I believe NE has 2 2nd round picks correct? So we would obtain their 2 2nd round picks, and their 3rd... How is that not value

I don't know if the want to pay for 3X 1st round picks, but you never know.

This is the list of the Patriots draft picks going into the 2011 NFL Draft:

1st Round – #17 (OAK – Richard Seymour)
1st Round – #32*
2nd Round – #33 (CAR – 2010 3rd Round)
2nd Round – #64*
3rd Round – #74 (MIN – Randy Moss)
3rd Round – #96*
4th Round
5th Round
6th Round (NO – David Thomas)

[Bucket]

Originally Posted by wilsowilso

Hey genius. Look up the word VALUE in the dictionary.

Suggesting that we trade the number 10 pick in the draft for a second and third round pick is a clown shoes idea.

It's hardly even worth responding to because it is such an absurd comment.

Then why do it?