Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Evaluating the Redskins Trade Bait:

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-13-2011, 03:57 PM   #1
Monkeydad
Living Legend
 
Monkeydad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 47
Posts: 17,460
Re: Evaluating the Redskins Trade Bait:

He can handle Haynesworth. Haslett did OK as HC with the Rams. Then, we could scrap Haslett's schemes for Schwartz'.

The only problem left...what to do with Kyle?

Will have to be a package deal. Let the offense call their own plays, then McNabb won't have to study. If Rex is the man...chuck it every play.



Heck, Haslett took the Florida Tuckers to the 2009 championship game. He's a winner.
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster
Monkeydad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2011, 03:59 PM   #2
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Evaluating the Redskins Trade Bait:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Buster View Post
He can handle Haynesworth. Haslett did OK as HC with the Rams. Then, we could scrap Haslett's schemes for Schwartz'.

The only problem left...what to do with Kyle?

Will have to be a package deal. Let the offense call their own plays, then McNabb won't have to study. If Rex is the man...chuck it every play.



Heck, Haslett took the Florida Tuckers to the 2009 championship game. He's a winner.
Not as much of a winner as Jim Fassel. Two time UFL Champion! 40 years from Broadway will put on a play about him
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2011, 04:04 PM   #3
Monkeydad
Living Legend
 
Monkeydad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 47
Posts: 17,460
Re: Evaluating the Redskins Trade Bait:

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
Not as much of a winner as Jim Fassel. Two time UFL Champion! 40 years from Broadway will put on a play about him
WOW. You filled in the blank. Fassel will be the new OC under Haslett.


He and Graham Gano = Championship (it has happened before!)



2011 Redskins:

HC - Jim Haslett
OC - Jim Fassel
DC - Jim Schwartz

QB - Grossman
Stats = 4,715 yds, 37 TDs, 21 INTs, 21 fumbles lost, sacked 43 times, 32 rushing yds

NFL Defensive POY - Haynesworth

NFL MVP - Graham Gano (A Skins kicker proved it can happen)

Super Bowl MVP - Kevin Barnes





Don't you love the offseason?
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster
Monkeydad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2011, 05:23 PM   #4
Dirtbag59
Naega jeil jal naga
 
Dirtbag59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 40
Posts: 14,750
Re: Evaluating the Redskins Trade Bait:

Bruce Allen is already casting the bait out into the pond. No outright releases for our two most precious trade chips until the 11th hour.

Redskins Insider - Bruce Allen: Albert Haynesworth could return to Skins next season

Redskins Insider - Bruce Allen speaks with Donovan McNabb's agent
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice."
- Scooter

"I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now."
- FRPLG
Dirtbag59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2011, 05:57 PM   #5
SirClintonPortis
Pro Bowl
 
SirClintonPortis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,052
Re: Evaluating the Redskins Trade Bait:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirtbag359 View Post
Bruce Allen is already casting the bait out into the pond. No outright releases for our two most precious trade chips until the 11th hour.

Redskins Insider - Bruce Allen: Albert Haynesworth could return to Skins next season

Redskins Insider - Bruce Allen speaks with Donovan McNabb's agent
Bruce Allen is Shanahan's first-class golden retreiver.
__________________
Analysis using datasets (aka stats) is an attempt at reverse-engineering a player's "goodness".

Virtuosity remembered, douchebaggery forgotten.

The ideal character profile shoved down modern Western men and women's throats is Don Juan.
SirClintonPortis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2011, 08:48 AM   #6
Longtimefan
Playmaker
 
Longtimefan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Germantown, Md.
Posts: 4,832
Re: Evaluating the Redskins Trade Bait:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirtbag359 View Post
Bruce Allen is already casting the bait out into the pond. No outright releases for our two most precious trade chips until the 11th hour.

Redskins Insider - Bruce Allen: Albert Haynesworth could return to Skins next season

Redskins Insider - Bruce Allen speaks with Donovan McNabb's agent
A good PR tactic by Allen. No need to further diminish the potential trade value of the two players on the team most people feel will eventually be traded. Time for everyone to rethink their positions in search of more favorable options.
__________________
A revolution is coming and it will be televised.
Longtimefan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2011, 07:34 PM   #7
sportscurmudgeon
Playmaker
 
sportscurmudgeon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,159
Re: Evaluating the Redskins Trade Bait:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Buster View Post
WOW. You filled in the blank. Fassel will be the new OC under Haslett.


He and Graham Gano = Championship (it has happened before!)



2011 Redskins:

HC - Jim Haslett
OC - Jim Fassel
DC - Jim Schwartz

QB - Grossman
Stats = 4,715 yds, 37 TDs, 21 INTs, 21 fumbles lost, sacked 43 times, 32 rushing yds

NFL Defensive POY - Haynesworth

NFL MVP - Graham Gano (A Skins kicker proved it can happen)

Super Bowl MVP - Kevin Barnes





Don't you love the offseason?


Whatever you are smoking as you are typing, it has to be illegal...

Where can I get some?
__________________
The Sports Curmudgeon
www.sportscurmudgeon.com
But don't get me wrong, I love sports...
sportscurmudgeon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2011, 08:43 AM   #8
Monkeydad
Living Legend
 
Monkeydad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 47
Posts: 17,460
Re: Evaluating the Redskins Trade Bait:

Quote:
Originally Posted by sportscurmudgeon View Post
Whatever you are smoking as you are typing, it has to be illegal...

Where can I get some?
No drugs required, just a long-term membership to The Warpath.



We've had some downright insane offseason discussions here. It's become a tradition.


How the WP works:

Preseason = This is our year! Also, campaign to start as many guys off the street and practice squad as possible! (Colt Brennan, Chase Daniel, Ade Jimoh, Marcus Mason, Marko Mitchell)

Gamedays = Sky is falling, act like we're losing by 60 then when the game ends, say "good win".

Postseason = Sadness...

Offseason = Insane trade scenarios!
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster
Monkeydad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2011, 03:59 PM   #9
44ever
Registered User
 
44ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: The Fortune Teller
Posts: 2,512
Re: Evaluating the Redskins Trade Bait:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Buster View Post
He can handle Haynesworth. Haslett did OK as HC with the Rams. Then, we could scrap Haslett's schemes for Schwartz'.

The only problem left...what to do with Kyle?

Will have to be a package deal. Let the offense call their own plays, then McNabb won't have to study. If Rex is the man...chuck it every play.



Heck, Haslett took the Florida Tuckers to the 2009 championship game. He's a winner.
^^^ This actually could work!
44ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2011, 08:06 PM   #10
44ever
Registered User
 
44ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: The Fortune Teller
Posts: 2,512
Re: Evaluating the Redskins Trade Bait:

Man I hope we don't trade AH to the Eagles. Sorry, just thinking out loud.
44ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2011, 09:10 PM   #11
skinsnut
Playmaker
 
skinsnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,063
Re: Evaluating the Redskins Trade Bait:

Anyone think of this?
The skins essentially "buy" a better draft pick by making McNabb's contract more favorable for the next team...say give him some sort of immediate roster bonus then stretch the contract another year....McNabb would be happy and the new team could afford him per year much better....making him more valuable and increase his trade value from a 5th rounder to potentially ...don't laugh....a 3rd.
It will just cost a few million bucks.

Keep in mind...we could also somehow find a way to have contracts redone so they become unrestricted free agents (such as Haynesworth)....which could yield us as much as a trade or more as a compensory pick (theoretically).

Please someone correct me if I am wrong...just getting creative on how to get better picks....I still wanted Randy Moss midseason....just so releasing him would result in a compensory pick....we need to start thinking like the Pats....10 picks a year, every year...now that is a team building goal.
I can't remember how many times I've seen the Pats have multiple picks in the first 2 rounds the last few years....all this while making the playoffs almost every year.
__________________
I hate Dallas...Period
skinsnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2011, 09:38 PM   #12
skinsnut
Playmaker
 
skinsnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,063
Re: Evaluating the Redskins Trade Bait:

I just looked up the pats
2011
9 total picks
4 in top 2 rounds

2010
12 total picks
4 in top 2 rounds

2009
12 total picks
4 in top 2 rounds

I definately see a pattern...they average 10 picks a year over the last 7 years or so...
But they only had 3 picks in the top 2 rounds total for the 2 years prior to this....I guess paying the price for a couple years can get you into a surplus mode like this.

I really like the idea of making trades for future years as you always get a round higher in return... Heck...why not trade our whole damn draft for a round better next year....then next year we'd have something like
3 #1s (2nd from this year traded forward plus our 1st traded forward for 1st and 2nd)
2 #2s
1 #3
3 #4s (2 5ths from this year traded forward)
1 #5s
3 #6s (2 7ths from this year traded forward, whats a 7th worth anyways? why not?)
1 #7

There is something screwy with that valuation thing....its just no one has tried this yet....we may as well do it and go hard after free agents in this great market this year...and we could then trade some of these to forward years too...heck...anything over 10 picks is just waste anyways...they aint all gunna make the squad.
We could do this in one year...it would be radical...but it just might work!
__________________
I hate Dallas...Period
skinsnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2011, 03:14 AM   #13
tryfuhl
Gamebreaker
 
tryfuhl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 42
Posts: 12,514
Re: Evaluating the Redskins Trade Bait:

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsnut View Post
I just looked up the pats
2011
9 total picks
4 in top 2 rounds

2010
12 total picks
4 in top 2 rounds

2009
12 total picks
4 in top 2 rounds

I definately see a pattern...they average 10 picks a year over the last 7 years or so...
But they only had 3 picks in the top 2 rounds total for the 2 years prior to this....I guess paying the price for a couple years can get you into a surplus mode like this.

I really like the idea of making trades for future years as you always get a round higher in return... Heck...why not trade our whole damn draft for a round better next year....then next year we'd have something like
3 #1s (2nd from this year traded forward plus our 1st traded forward for 1st and 2nd)
2 #2s
1 #3
3 #4s (2 5ths from this year traded forward)
1 #5s
3 #6s (2 7ths from this year traded forward, whats a 7th worth anyways? why not?)
1 #7

There is something screwy with that valuation thing....its just no one has tried this yet....we may as well do it and go hard after free agents in this great market this year...and we could then trade some of these to forward years too...heck...anything over 10 picks is just waste anyways...they aint all gunna make the squad.
We could do this in one year...it would be radical...but it just might work!
Then trade the number 1s for the number 1 overall and get Luck! CHAMPIONSHIP!
tryfuhl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2011, 01:22 PM   #14
skinsnut
Playmaker
 
skinsnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,063
Re: Evaluating the Redskins Trade Bait:

Quote:
Originally Posted by tryfuhl View Post
Then trade the number 1s for the number 1 overall and get Luck! CHAMPIONSHIP!
And...since there will likely be a rookie cap...we'd only have to pay him minimum wage!
__________________
I hate Dallas...Period
skinsnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2011, 02:11 PM   #15
redsk1
The Starter
 
redsk1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,351
Re: Evaluating the Redskins Trade Bait:

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsnut View Post
I just looked up the pats
2011
9 total picks
4 in top 2 rounds

2010
12 total picks
4 in top 2 rounds

2009
12 total picks
4 in top 2 rounds

I definately see a pattern...they average 10 picks a year over the last 7 years or so...
But they only had 3 picks in the top 2 rounds total for the 2 years prior to this....I guess paying the price for a couple years can get you into a surplus mode like this.

I really like the idea of making trades for future years as you always get a round higher in return... Heck...why not trade our whole damn draft for a round better next year....then next year we'd have something like
3 #1s (2nd from this year traded forward plus our 1st traded forward for 1st and 2nd)
2 #2s
1 #3
3 #4s (2 5ths from this year traded forward)
1 #5s
3 #6s (2 7ths from this year traded forward, whats a 7th worth anyways? why not?)
1 #7

There is something screwy with that valuation thing....its just no one has tried this yet....we may as well do it and go hard after free agents in this great market this year...and we could then trade some of these to forward years too...heck...anything over 10 picks is just waste anyways...they aint all gunna make the squad.
We could do this in one year...it would be radical...but it just might work!
How dare you try to replicate what the Pats, Eagles, Packers do? Are you insane? That would never work here. The Future Is Now!

Yes, our draft philosophy has got to change. Getting extra picks now and in the future is a wise thing. I'm in awe of how many damn picks, the Eagles get each year and the Pats get each year.

BTW..check out this EXCELLENT, amazing article on how good the Pats draft.

How Belichick Wins With Spare Parts - NYTimes.com

Based on an "average draft position" by team, NE is consistently the lowest draft position in NFL history, several times. One of the other teams...91 Skins w/ Rypien, Sanders, Clark, etc. Check it out, amazing article.
redsk1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.26430 seconds with 11 queries