![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
| View Poll Results: Who's the more problematic player? | |||
| Arrington |
|
30 | 40.54% |
| Taylor |
|
44 | 59.46% |
| Voters: 74. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | ||
|
Puppy Kicker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 43
Posts: 8,341
|
Re: Arrington vs. Taylor: Who's the bigger "problem"?
Quote:
What off the field problems? Okay, he screwed up and missed the rookie synopsis. The courtroom seemed pretty obvious that Taylor wasn't drunk. Speeding? Sure, but everyone said overwhelmingly that he wasn't drunk. Innocent until proven guilty. Quote:
I think we'd dump Lavar before Taylor (provided it was fiscally possible) because Taylor is the better athelete by far. I don't see Snyder letting Taylor go if for marketing purposes alone.
__________________
Best. Player. Available. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | ||
|
The Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Age: 50
Posts: 1,340
|
Re: Arrington vs. Taylor: Who's the bigger "problem"?
Quote:
So somehow quietly ignoring the team and simply not showing up to team events is better than letting the team know where they stand with you? At least with LA you know what you're dealing with. Taylor doesn't say a thing, then all the sudden he's not there at workouts, he doesn't return you calls, and you're left wondering what got up his a$$. Me, I'd rather have somebody vocalize what their problem is with me (albeit in a less public forum than Lavar did). To me, there is nothing more frustrating than passive resistence. I'd place money that Gibbs will be able to work out his problems with Lavar a heck of a lot sooner than he will be able to with ST (if ever). Quote:
__________________
"Hail to the Redskins!" and "Fight on State!" |
||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|