![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
| View Poll Results: BuckSkin's What Position Should We Draft at #10 Poll | |||
| QB |
|
37 | 35.58% |
| WR |
|
2 | 1.92% |
| RB |
|
0 | 0% |
| OL |
|
18 | 17.31% |
| DL |
|
14 | 13.46% |
| LB |
|
13 | 12.50% |
| DB |
|
0 | 0% |
| Trade the pick |
|
20 | 19.23% |
| Voters: 104. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,052
|
Re: 2011 Senior Bowl Week
Quote:
That does not mean I said "this is a reason we should take him at tenth in the first round". That does not mean I said "so-and-so should not be taken". That does not mean "Locker is better than every other QB out there". I said what Mayock said was interesting. I said it may possibly mean one of Locker's issues may be partially fixable. That is all. I did not even mention what I would do. What I would do, given my gigantic ignorance in all things draft, is burn a [nonexistent] 3rd rounder on him in a hypothetical world.
__________________
Analysis using datasets (aka stats) is an attempt at reverse-engineering a player's "goodness". Virtuosity remembered, douchebaggery forgotten. The ideal character profile shoved down modern Western men and women's throats is Don Juan. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 4,153
|
Re: 2011 Senior Bowl Week
Quote:
Not nailing you CP, just the media's love affair with Locker. I figured you were just going along with the article. I found it rather amusing how all the booth guys for the Nebraska vs Wash bowl game were fawning over the kid, even though his passing game was crap. The kid blows chunks for a 4 year starter. As for Cam, I rather get Gabbert or Ponder, but Cam gets the nod over Locker anyday. When guys were talking about Locker in here last year as a possible QB for us I gagged. Guy was a INT machine. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|