Snyder Camp Upset!!

[tryfuhl]

Originally Posted by Dirtbag359

Snyder reminds me of a more sinister version of Ari Gold.

The peso's comment especially reminds me of Snyder's "charity defense."

Piven ftw

[NC_Skins]

^^ thanks for the huge laugh

[Warren85Ellard]

Typical day at Mr. Snyder's office......

YouTube - Swimming With Sharks - 5. "Sweet &...

[Dirtbag59]

Just out of curiosity, besides immediate members of JKC's family as well as his four ex wives, who was in line to buy the Redskins besides Snyder back in 1999? Was there a waiting list of 200,000 billionaires?

Seriously though who else was up against Snyder in 1999?

[BringBackJoeT]

Originally Posted by Dirtbag359

Just out of curiosity, besides immediate members of JKC's family as well as his four ex wives, who was in line to buy the Redskins besides Snyder back in 1999? Was there a waiting list of 200,000 billionaires?

Seriously though who else was up against Snyder in 1999?

Answer courtesy of our beloved Dave McKenna of the Washington City Paper:
Cheap Seats Daily: The World’s Greatest Beer Man, Milstein Resurfaces, Ficker Running Again - City Desk - Washington City Paper

[MTK]

Hard to believe but we could have ended up with an even bigger a-hole as owner

[NYCSkin]

I am just trying to imagine what the players, coaches, and GM think about this latest fiasco.

Maybe they don't care. Maybe it doesn't matter to them that their company's top executive displays so little class, humility, and emotional intelligence.

Somehow though I think it matters to someone like...London Fletcher.

And what if it matters, even a little bit, to more players and others in the organization? Could you honestly put forth maximum effort in your job, regardless of how lavishly you were being paid, and produce maximum results--if you knew your company's top executive projected dysfunction? Could you just focus on your own professional excellence if you basically did not respect your leader?

With this degree of consistent dysfunction at the top it's so easy to see why the product the Skins produce is consistently unsuccessful...

[Longtimefan]

This article expresses the viewpoint that many have already shared here. "You've got to know when to hold them, know when to fold them" and most of all, know when to walk away.

PostLeadership: Redskins' Snyder: Reputation management in a digital age - Jena McGregor

Interesting comments.....

[Monksdown]

I take Snyder's side on this one. And i can honestly say that other than firing Cerrato twice, i haven't agreed with him on much. The article, while accurate was inflamatory and tasted a little too much of yellow journalism. I mean, yes he cut down trees that didn't belong to him and were protected. But did he go 'agent orange' on them?

And i personally think that depicting a jew with devil horns is one of the most despicable things i've seen in print in a long time. For that alone, 2 million plus fees is appropriate. That's just my opinion. I like that he will give it to homeless organizations if he wins.

I understand that the author didn't place the devil horns on the picture himself, that it was probably done by someone ignorant of the history tied to the that insult for jewish people. The buck stops at the editor, and i will never read their material again. And i don't want a publication that puts that garbage out in our town.

[saden1]

Originally Posted by Monksdown

I take Snyder's side on this one. And i can honestly say that other than firing Cerrato twice, i haven't agreed with him on much. The article, while accurate was inflamatory and tasted a little too much of yellow journalism. I mean, yes he cut down trees that didn't belong to him and were protected. But did he go 'agent orange' on them?

And i personally think that depicting a jew with devil horns is one of the most despicable things i've seen in print in a long time. For that alone, 2 million plus fees is appropriate. That's just my opinion. I like that he will give it to homeless organizations if he wins.

I understand that the author didn't place the devil horns on the picture himself, that it was probably done by someone ignorant of the history tied to the that insult for jewish people. The buck stops at the editor, and i will never read their material again. And i don't want a publication that puts that garbage out in our town.

I don't understand how it can be like yellow journalism if it's accurate. The man gave you what has transpired during Snyder's tenure and even sourced his article with links.

What country does your ass think you live in to think you're entitled to 2 million dollars for an unfaltering picture of you? You're silly.

Snyder is a cunt, it' doesn't matter whether he is Jewish or not and no one gives a shit what he is. If you're offended by the picture of him I sympathies but the shit he has done is truly despicable. Snyder is a despicable loathsome man and it's all his own doing. I am officially done buying Redskins product and supporting that little weasel.

[Monksdown]

Originally Posted by saden1

I don't understand how it can be like yellow journalism if it's accurate. The man gave you what has transpired during Snyder's tenure and even sourced his article with links.

What country does your ass think you live in to think you're entitled to 2 million dollars for an unfaltering picture of you? You're silly.

Snyder is a cunt, it' doesn't matter whether he is Jewish or not and no one gives a shit what he is. If you're offended by the picture of him I sympathies but the shit he has done is truly despicable. Snyder is a despicable loathsome man and it's all his own doing. I am officially done buying Redskins product and supporting that little weasel.

Did he release an illegal chemical agent on the trees across the street from his house? That is a gross exaggeration. And that's why that writer is writing for the Washington City paper. The what?! Yeah, i didn't know about it either.

I support Dan Snyder more because of his lawsuit, not less. i didn't care what he was until someone put devil horns on him. I understand your anger though.

[skinsguy]

You do realize since we're probably going into a lockout year with no free agency that this is the only thing we have to entertain us Redskins fans! Gotta hand it do Dan the man, he never disappoints!

[NC_Skins]

Originally Posted by Monksdown

And i personally think that depicting a jew with devil horns is one of the most despicable things i've seen in print in a long time. For that alone, 2 million plus fees is appropriate. That's just my opinion. I like that he will give it to homeless organizations if he wins.

I understand that the author didn't place the devil horns on the picture himself, that it was probably done by someone ignorant of the history tied to the that insult for jewish people. The buck stops at the editor, and i will never read their material again. And i don't want a publication that puts that garbage out in our town.

I hate ignorant people and ignorant posts, and this takes the cake in my opinion. That article said absolutely nothing of his Jewish heritage, nor did that picture have anything to do with his religion. It's akin to Jessie Jackson pulling the ole race card when shit doesn't fit his agenda.

From the article below.

And oh, by the way, the cover artist and the editor who approved it are both Jewish.

So what were you saying again? Are you currently on the payroll of Dan Snyder? It sounds very much like you are.

Originally Posted by Monksdown

Brett Haber blows.

SO does anybody supporting Dan Snyder.

[Monksdown]

I would love to be on Dan Snyder's payroll. Who's the City paper again? You are so fully invested in the hate the owner train, that you can't even see the train stops as they fly by. He likes money, himself, the redskins, and his wife. he also likes his view of the river. He likes to clean shop when moves into a new business. I like everything about that.

[SirClintonPortis]

Originally Posted by Monksdown

I would love to be on Dan Snyder's payroll. Who's the City paper again? You are so fully invested in the hate the owner train, that you can't even see the train stops as they fly by. He likes money, himself, the redskins, and his wife. he also likes his view of the river. He likes to clean shop when moves into a new business. I like everything about that.

Very simple, for your simple mind.

McKenna needed to have INTENT he was sticking a devil caricature on a Jew. Did McKenna know he was making a Jewish caricature? It is NOT enough to say that he was sending an anti-semtic message because you go: "OMG, picture of Jewish dude with horns and beard". Why? Because he might have not know he was Jewish in the first place. Hence, it might have not been his INTENT to be making an anti-Semitic image.

Not only that, non-Jews have been given the same treatment.


I'm glad you aren't a judge, because you suck at it.