|
Debating with the enemy Discuss politics, current events, and other hot button issues here. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
02-18-2011, 03:49 PM | #46 |
Puppy Kicker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 41
Posts: 8,341
|
Re: Was a Superbowl Flyover Worth the $
I'm not sure if this is the right place to put this, but it is somewhat related. From what I understand, these are the responsibilities of all of the branches. Without a doubt there is overlap between nearly all the branches. Most branches have some sort of land, air, and sea forces available to them, and duties overlap a certain amount, but in relatively generic terms:
Marines: Push and capture new territory. They are the front line guys that secure locations. Army: Retain the locations and start the rebuilding process (if necessary) Navy/Air Force: Typically they are the support branches where when requested they will provide adequate sea/air power to support the Marines and the Army. Obviously this is referring to the typical wartime activities. I know that the Air Force and Army have pretty big cyber outfits as well. Kinda random, but this dude has the most awesome title ever: Vice Admiral David J. "Jack" Dorsett Deputy Chief of Naval Operations for Information Dominance
__________________
Best. Player. Available. |
Advertisements |
02-18-2011, 05:02 PM | #47 | ||
Inactive
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: DC Metro Area
Age: 46
Posts: 5,829
|
Re: Was a Superbowl Flyover Worth the $
Quote:
Quote:
The Marines are more specialized for beach front assaults but as you said they do overlap. The Marines are used in a similar fashion as the Army's front line units AKA Combat Arms Units (Rangers, Infantry, Calvary, Armor and Artillery). The Army and Marines both go in and grab a piece of territory. Because the Marines are fewer in numbers they are not equiped to occupy it as the Army can. The Army uses its Combat Support and Combat Service Support units to occupy ground and rebuild as you suggested earlier. Because the Marines are small and so specialized they always get the credit for being the first ones in because it is all that they do. In reality they were perhaps given the mission of pushing through one region while the Army's Combat Arms units were given the mission of pushing through several others. I am not taking anything away from the Marines because I respect all of my brothers in arms. However, giving them total credit for being the "First" ones in is total crap because they were fighting either along side of us or had a separate simultaneous responsibility. Last edited by KLHJ2; 02-18-2011 at 06:53 PM. |
||
02-19-2011, 02:10 PM | #48 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Eastern Ohio
Age: 55
Posts: 232
|
Re: Was a Superbowl Flyover Worth the $
That is a very simplistic, yet comprehensiven explanation Angry, thank you. Doctrinally speaking the USMC is a quick strike, tenacious branch of our military. They however are, as Angry said specialized, lacking logistical assets. The Army is a stand alone branch of our military... possessing all of the assets to survive a prolonged war. Logistics, communication, intelligence, personnel services, medical and of course combat forces.
__________________
"Any Nation willing to give up a little freedom, to gain a little security, will deserve neither, and lose both." -Benjamin Franklin |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|