Best/Worst Young Cores

[skinster]

Originally Posted by Jontrem

Are you trying to point out that Shannys old team obviously has a lack of young talent and that this could mean you think we have a HC who doesnt build young, talented teams? I'm not even 100% sure I would disagree with that, I'm just looking for some clarification if possible.

It wasn't my original intention, but coincidentally I think Shanny is terrible with personnel (good coach, but s*** with personnel). My original intention of this thread is simply to discuss the future of the NFL, who will be able to play at a high level for years to come.

[Jontrem]

Originally Posted by skinster

It wasn't my original intention, but coincidentally I think Shanny is terrible with personnel (good coach, but s*** with personnel). My original intention of this thread is simply to discuss the future of the NFL, who will be able to play at a high level for years to come.

Sadly not us right now! This draft/offseason (if there is a real F/A signing period) could tell us alot about how the team will be constructed under Shanny. If he goes for youth over names I will dance a little jig!

And thanks for the clarification, I wasnt trying to be a D-bag or anything just trying to understand

[skinsfaninok]

He said Phlly is loaded on D right?

Of course I didn't mean GB folks, I'm not a drunk lol

[Monkeydad]

I think there is. Portis, Daniels, Rabach...plenty of our players are aging and on the way out. We do have young possible replacements for most of them.

[Jontrem]

Originally Posted by Buster

I think there is. Portis, Daniels, Rabach...plenty of our players are aging and on the way out. We do have young possible replacements for most of them.

Do you think the young possible replacements will get the nod for starting positions though? I love Portis and he has been my favorite current Skin for a long time but I don't want to see him as our opening day RB. i guess it all goes back to Shanny and the FO's mindset. I'll keep my dancing shoes ready just in case though!

Hmmm maybe I could have thought of a more manly way of saying that?