|
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
04-23-2005, 02:37 PM
|
#1 |
|
MVP
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 46
Posts: 10,069
|
Re: Mike Williams!!!!!!!!!!
I believe Matty owes me a new title and Avatar.
|
|
|
|
04-23-2005, 02:41 PM
|
#2 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Crofton, MD
Age: 56
Posts: 907
|
Re: Mike Williams!!!!!!!!!!
Props to Gibbs and Snyder for NOT going with the flashier pick!
Detroit is gonna have a tough time controlling the egos of 3 1st round WR's.... |
|
|
|
|
04-23-2005, 03:13 PM
|
#3 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: chesapeake,va.
Posts: 2,160
|
Re: Mike Williams!!!!!!!!!!
the skins made the right decission. cb was a bigger need.
|
|
|
|
|
04-23-2005, 03:24 PM
|
#4 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, VA
Age: 41
Posts: 3,109
|
Re: Mike Williams!!!!!!!!!!
DE was the need
|
|
|
|
|
04-23-2005, 03:33 PM
|
#5 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: chesapeake,va.
Posts: 2,160
|
Re: Mike Williams!!!!!!!!!!
they lost a player (starter) at cb, they did not lose anyone at de, infact they have a player comming back from injury at de. yes they could use a de but not as much as they need a cb.
|
|
|
|
|
04-23-2005, 03:35 PM
|
#6 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, VA
Age: 41
Posts: 3,109
|
Re: Mike Williams!!!!!!!!!!
I feel like they have the players at CB to step up from back ups. I don't even think we have starters at DE right now. That's my problem. I understand the pick, especially from their standpoint, it makes sense. I just don't like it.
|
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
