Redskins Draft Analysis Thread

[Lotus]

Originally Posted by Mattyk

I know some think it was overkill taking 3 WRs and 2 RBs, but those are positions that lacked depth and playmakers, so I've got zero problem with going heavy on those positions.

You are correct that those positions lacked depth and playmakers. But so does QB as well as DL (well, young depth on the DL). I would not have minded one less WR and one more player in another position.

I have no problems with taking the two RB's we did. We have changed the complexion of our backfield and receivers and that is great.

[Redskin Warrior]

Originally Posted by Mattyk

I know some think it was overkill taking 3 WRs and 2 RBs, but those are positions that lacked depth and playmakers, so I've got zero problem with going heavy on those positions.

I don't think it was overkill at all. Santana might not be back and Portis is gone. Torrain & Kelly have been hurt, Keiland Williams & James Davis the jury is still out on them. I think we did well in the draft.

[CRedskinsRule]

One point where our aging cast may help us, is during this lockout, especially if it extends, We have some good mentors for most every rookie we drafted. Fletcher/Daniels - Kerrigan/Jenkins/Neild, Santana - the WR's, Portis maybe for the RB's. Lots of experience to hook up with the young guys, and all these guys sound like players who will listen to experienced vets.

[SirClintonPortis]

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

One point where our aging cast may help us, is during this lockout, especially if it extends, We have some good mentors for most every rookie we drafted. Fletcher/Daniels - Kerrigan/Jenkins/Neild, Santana - the WR's, Portis maybe for the RB's. Lots of experience to hook up with the young guys, and all these guys sound like players who will listen to experienced vets.

Portis ain't coming back.

[JoeRedskin]

I could have gone without the Gomes and with one less WR (although both late round WR's seem to be getting good reviews) in order to add a QB and OL ... BUT since it is a crapshoot, and since only time will tell, I am just basking in the "12 picks?!! Holy Sh**" moment.

[Jontrem]

I gave us a solid B. Liked the first 4 picks alot, the next two less (though I dislike Nebraska a little so this may have played into it) In case anyone didnt see what Parcells said about Kerrigan I will post it below (sorry if this is a repost)

On his Draft show tonight at the very end--

Tiricio: Who are some of the guys..... when they get selected in the draft, you would say, that's a pretty good pick?

Parcells: Ryan Kerrigan. If you look at Purdue's recent history, this guy plays the same position as Cliff Avril, Anthony Spencer, Ray Edwards, Shawn Phillips.....next in line: Ryan Kerrigan.....be a good player for somebody.

[Jontrem]

I like the change in philosophy that has occurred (IE we now actually value draft picks!) but some of the trade downs made it seem to me like the FO was trying a little too hard at it, almost like they were trying to send a message that they were serious about changing there MO....anyone thoughts on this?

[KI Skins Fan]

Originally Posted by Jontrem

I like the change in philosophy that has occurred (IE we now actually value draft picks!) but some of the trade downs made it seem to me like the FO was trying a little too hard at it, almost like they were trying to send a message that they were serious about changing there MO....anyone thoughts on this?

They were simply trying to bring in a lot of players because they are rebuilding the team. I doubt that Mike Shanahan cares what we think.

[BigHairedAristocrat]

Originally Posted by Jontrem

I like the change in philosophy that has occurred (IE we now actually value draft picks!) but some of the trade downs made it seem to me like the FO was trying a little too hard at it, almost like they were trying to send a message that they were serious about changing there MO....anyone thoughts on this?

No. Shanahan had never cared what anyone else thinks. The idea that he'd trade Down just to send a message to the fans is downright ridiculous.

[redsk1]

I liked our draft. We need a youth infusion into our team and this helps. I really liked the Kerrigan, Hankerson, Helu, Robinson picks. I would have liked to see another OL in there but hey we've got needs everywhere else too.

It's going to take a couple years of doing it this way too. I'm ok w/ that.

[Dirtbag59]

Biggest mistake of the draft. Not using a late round pick on Luck.

I remember the Florida Panthers tried to do the same thing with Ovechkin in the 2003 draft.

[Son Of Man]

Chris Neild is reminding me alot of Kelly Gregg (Ravens) for some reason. Hard nose, try hard scrapper.

[Son Of Man]

Killing time at the dentist today, I drew out our 3-4 defensive personnel on paper today and came away mildly impressed.

RDE- Jenkins, NT- Bryant/Neild, LDE- Carriker
ROLB- Rak, ILB- Fletcher, ILB- Riley/Henson, LOLB- Kerrigan
FS- Otogwe, SS- Landry
CB- Hall, Barnes, Brandyn Thompson

*And this is without resigning our guys (Los) and before adding FA. Pretty good if you ask me.

[Ruhskins]

Originally Posted by Son Of Man

Killing time at the dentist today, I drew out our 3-4 defensive personnel on paper today and came away mildly impressed.

RDE- Jenkins, NT- Bryant/Neild, LDE- Carriker
ROLB- Rak, ILB- Fletcher, ILB- Riley/Henson, LOLB- Kerrigan
FS- Otogwe, SS- Landry
CB- Hall, Barnes, Brandyn Thompson

*And this is without resigning our guys (Los) and before adding FA. Pretty good if you ask me.

I say F it, let's get Nnamdi.

[Son Of Man]

Originally Posted by Ruhskins

I say F it, let's get Nnamdi.

Actually, I'm leaning more toward re-signing Los. He can't catch a cold but he is a good cover corner who tackles well and plays physical.