GMAN's Back and He's not very happy

offiss · 04-24-2005, 06:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

Maybe, but there was talk that the Packers may have taken him if Rogers wasn't there.

3rd round probably would have been a stretch. 2nd round more likely.

If that was the case I have an even bigger problem with us moving up, because GB picked in front of us.

wolfeskins · 04-24-2005, 06:40 PM

[QUOTE=offiss]If that was the case I have an even bigger problem with us moving up, because GB picked in front of us.

i don't think gb intended to use their #1 pick on a qb but when aaron rogers was still available they felt he was too good to pass up.

04-24-2005, 06:40 PM	#2
wolfeskins The Starter Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: chesapeake,va. Posts: 2,160	Re: GMAN's Back and He's not very happy [QUOTE=offiss]If that was the case I have an even bigger problem with us moving up, because GB picked in front of us. i don't think gb intended to use their #1 pick on a qb but when aaron rogers was still available they felt he was too good to pass up.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

GMAN's Back and He's not very happy

Locker Room Main Forum