Moss WANTS to be a Redskin

[NC_Skins]

Originally Posted by MonkFan4Life

I understand what you are saying but there is a common theme in a lot of your ideas. It's like listening to the Lavar and Dukes show sometimes, I know if there is a negative, no matter how small it is you will find it and focus solely on that. I could be wrong but that's just how it reads. I'm not saying that you have to feel like all is great but sometimes I wonder why you stick with the swuad at all. You're cool though but I always can guess where you are going to go with something. It's needed though,

Hail !

Apparently you missed the draft threads, or the threads that Dirtbag did breaking down the plays. I think you just focus on the negative things I write instead of the positive. Also, there is a common theme (negative) with the posts because this franchise has been negative for the past decade. It's been blunder after blunder for so long. I've stated time and time again I'm happy with the direction of this franchise at it's current state and hope like hell Snyder stays the **** away to let Bruce and Mike do their thing.

Make no mistake about it, I've been wanting players like MeAngelo, Portis and Moss (and many others) gone for a long time. I think they were also part of the problem and culture that infected this team for quite sometime.

[Ruhskins]

Originally Posted by NC_Skins

Apparently you missed the draft threads, or the threads that Dirtbag did breaking down the plays. I think you just focus on the negative things I write instead of the positive. Also, there is a common theme (negative) with the posts because this franchise has been negative for the past decade. It's been blunder after blunder for so long. I've stated time and time again I'm happy with the direction of this franchise at it's current state and hope like hell Snyder stays the **** away to let Bruce and Mike do their thing.

Make no mistake about it, I've been wanting players like MeAngelo, Portis and Moss (and many others) gone for a long time. I think they were also part of the problem and culture that infected this team for quite sometime.

I think you focus too much on guys like Portis, Moss or Hall. In the end, how the team performs has a lot to do with the coaching staff and front office. I am fine with the direction that this team is going, but I want to see more good decisions made by the front office and less of the stupid ones from last season (McNabb trade, keeping the Haynesworth issue alive, the McNabb benching).

[MonkFan4Life]

Originally Posted by NC_Skins

Apparently you missed the draft threads, or the threads that Dirtbag did breaking down the plays. I think you just focus on the negative things I write instead of the positive. Also, there is a common theme (negative) with the posts because this franchise has been negative for the past decade. It's been blunder after blunder for so long. I've stated time and time again I'm happy with the direction of this franchise at it's current state and hope like hell Snyder stays the **** away to let Bruce and Mike do their thing.

Make no mistake about it, I've been wanting players like MeAngelo, Portis and Moss (and many others) gone for a long time. I think they were also part of the problem and culture that infected this team for quite sometime.

Now you are entirely too smart to make statements like that. So I get it, much like alot of Skins fans you focus on since Snyder got here. We were getting our asses kicked when Cooke 1 owned the team, while Cooke 2 looked over the team, and now while Snyder has owned the team. We didn't just start signing guys to big money for them to get here and not look as good as the contract number say they should. If you're going to talk about how bad the team is then make sure you accept the fact that Casserly ****ed up just like anyone else did. Still waiting on you to make it up this way so we can have that brew and discuss this team.

I don't focus solely on the negative things you say that's what I see on the threads I look at. I took flack here because while Iwas not the only one who disliked jason Campbell I acted like it. So I know where you are coming from where your opinion is your opnion but it's a lot like what I hear here on a certain sportstalk station that prides themselves on shitting on Danny and anything that goes on with him. Portis while a diva at times didn't deserve alot of the shit that he took but that's for another conversation.

I swear Danny needs to hire me !

[MTK]

Originally Posted by MonkFan4Life

NC I swear you could find the negatives in a girl on girl video betwee Jessica Alba and Sofia Vegara. I agree with you on the 1-2 year deal but I'd give him at least 3.

[Ruhskins]

Originally Posted by MonkFan4Life

NC I swear you could find the negatives in a girl on girl video between Jessica Alba and Sofia Vegara. I agree with you on the 1-2 year deal but I'd give him at least 3.

[NLC1054]

It doesn't look to me like Santana "quit" there.

Granted, I wasn't a huge Redskins' fan back then, so maybe I'm missing the emotional attachment to that moment, but it looks like a bad throw by Todd Collins that Santana thought was going to go out of bounds. Maybe he could've come back to the ball, but I don't think he "quit" everything. He came out and ran his route hard.

Then when the ball was picked off he was trying to stop the guy. A guy who "quits" usually isn't a guy who's going to try and run anyone down.

I could be totally wrong though.

[30gut]

I don't think Tana's production is as easily replaceable as people think.

[NLC1054]

Originally Posted by 30gut

I don't think Tana's production is as easily replaceable as people think.

Same here. I don't think you can drop just anyone in the slot and have them catch 93 balls. Especially not a rookie. And I like all the rookie wideouts and second year guys we have.

But I still think you need that vet there to take the pressure off the young guys.

[MTK]

Having a veteran presence at WR is going to be huge with all the young guys we now have. Couple that with his production and I'd imagine he's going to be a high priority once the league opens for business.

[NLC1054]

PORTIS is a Belichick type of player!?

In what world?

[GTripp0012]

Originally Posted by NLC1054

PORTIS is a Belichick type of player!?

In what world?

The world where putting a blitzing ILB on his ass is a skill desired to allow Brady to get the ball down the field to less-than-ideal deep threats.

[NLC1054]

Originally Posted by GTripp0012

The world where putting a blitzing ILB on his ass is a skill desired to allow Brady to get the ball down the field to less-than-ideal deep threats.

And what about staying quiet and not causing any drama and speaking out?

[GTripp0012]

Originally Posted by NLC1054

And what about staying quiet and not causing any drama and speaking out?

Who cares, really? That can be problematic in Washington when the team loses every year and Portis gets to put his take on what went wrong, but in New England stuff like that would never happen.

[Ruhskins]

Originally Posted by NLC1054

And what about staying quiet and not causing any drama and speaking out?

Darth Hoody can actually work with character players and gets production out of them. And if they don't work out, then he just gets rid of them.

[SirClintonPortis]

Originally Posted by NLC1054

And what about staying quiet and not causing any drama and speaking out?

Portis is one of those "soft" drama-causers that unleashes that side of him when there isn't anyone in the family punishing him harshly enough or threatening such punishment clearly enough. He shut up under Shanahan, but he was given "star" favoritism under Gibbs. That's the difference.