Report claims Redskins won't cut Haynesworth

[Schneed10]

For me it's not about teaching a lesson or about the money (the money is a sunk cost). It's simply about the fact that he carries a low salary cap charge, I don't want him on another team, and I remain convinced that he'll reach a point where the quest for more money will motivate him to get his ass in gear again.

I could care less about the 53rd roster spot we'd gain by cutting him, that's not going to be an impact player no matter what. Haynesworth, however, might be.

[Ruhskins]

Originally Posted by Schneed10

For me it's not about teaching a lesson or about the money (the money is a sunk cost). It's simply about the fact that he carries a low salary cap charge, I don't want him on another team, and I remain convinced that he'll reach a point where the quest for more money will motivate him to get his ass in gear again.

I could care less about the 53rd roster spot we'd gain by cutting him, that's not going to be an impact player no matter what. Haynesworth, however, might be.

See your argument makes sense, personally I doubt it would happen, but it makes sense. I just gave up on this guy a long time ago. I think it would be great if he can come to his senses and dominate, but I just don't think that will happen. Especially if he gets suspended, although I don't think we're going to hear about this anytime soon. The league has wayyy to many priorities to be worrying about this moron.