Redskins ready to $pend?

[tryfuhl]

Originally Posted by skinster

I'm not sure your getting what I'm saying. I'm not even sure what you think I'm trying to justify.

That's a "clever" way out of having you explain yourself. You don't even get what you're saying, you're just saying shit.

[skinster]

Originally Posted by tryfuhl

That's a "clever" way out of having you explain yourself. You don't even get what you're saying, you're just saying shit.

or instead of insulting me, you could clarify by explaining what you think I'm justifying so I can respond. Unless your looking for a "clever" way out.

[tryfuhl]

Originally Posted by skinster

or instead of insulting me, you could clarify by explaining what you think I'm justifying so I can respond. Unless your looking for a "clever" way out.

Any logic thinker would be able to figure out what I was getting at. I am saying that your very vague definition of predictable is wrong. You're saying anyone that anyone taken at the end of the first or beginning of second is predictable. Yet you IGNORE the many years where men drafted in that position haven't been "predictable" franchise QBs. You simply pick the few recently that've worked out. So your model is better than the many personnel guys in the NFL? Why haven't you applied yet?

[skinster]

Originally Posted by tryfuhl

Any logic thinker would be able to figure out what I was getting at. I am saying that your very vague definition of predictable is wrong. You're saying anyone that anyone taken at the end of the first or beginning of second is predictable. Yet you IGNORE the many years where men drafted in that position haven't been "predictable" franchise QBs. You simply pick the few recently that've worked out. So your model is better than the many personnel guys in the NFL? Why haven't you applied yet?

LOL. You mean the way I use my invented phrase "predictable quarterback" is wrong? LOL (again)

I'm not ignoring anything. I simply used the phrase "predictable" to catagorize quarterbacks that teams drafted with the the expectation of them becoming a franchise quarterback. Pretty much every qb drafted in the top 50 picks goes in this category, whether they panned out or not. The ones that didn't had something that made an organization "predict" that they would pan out and they just didn't. I'm sorry you either don't like or understand my phrase.

And I'm still not entirely sure what your getting at considering that was such a small part of what I was saying, and you don't really make sense, so just to cover my bases (If my response was not on topic to your response that was not on topic) I'm going to say that I believe Luck to be different than other prospects. He is more than predictable, he is as close to a sure thing as we'll see in a while. And I'm sure many "personnel guys" already employed by the nfl would agree, they don't need me for that.

[tryfuhl]

Originally Posted by skinster

Pretty much every qb drafted in the top 50 picks goes in this category, whether they panned out or not. The ones that didn't had something that made an organization "predict" that they would pan out and they just didn't. I'm sorry you either don't like or understand my phrase.