Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Which Redskins Should Receive Contract Extensions after the Lockout

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-19-2011, 04:35 PM   #1
MTK
Hail Raiser
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,097
Re: Which Redskins Should Receive Contract Extensions after the Lockout

I'd prefer to keep Cooley & Davis too. Seems that all we hear every offseason now is this silly trade Cooley talk. He's only 29 and still very productive, no reason why he can't keep playing at a high level for another 4-5 seasons. Keep them both, and find a way to get Davis more involved.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2011, 04:58 PM   #2
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
Re: Which Redskins Should Receive Contract Extensions after the Lockout

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
I'd prefer to keep Cooley & Davis too. Seems that all we hear every offseason now is this silly trade Cooley talk. He's only 29 and still very productive, no reason why he can't keep playing at a high level for another 4-5 seasons. Keep them both, and find a way to get Davis more involved.
Three years in, we've refused to feature both in the same offense. If we're not going to hire an offensive mind that can do with two tight ends what all other teams are doing, and if it's going to be one player burying the other, then just move one now.

I think it's patently ridiculous that no offensive mind has figured out how to use two TEs at the same time to maximize the talent on our roster, but I just don't see it being any different this year.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2011, 05:02 PM   #3
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,380
Re: Which Redskins Should Receive Contract Extensions after the Lockout

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
Three years in, we've refused to feature both in the same offense. If we're not going to hire an offensive mind that can do with two tight ends what all other teams are doing, and if it's going to be one player burying the other, then just move one now.

I think it's patently ridiculous that no offensive mind has figured out how to use two TEs at the same time to maximize the talent on our roster, but I just don't see it being any different this year.
Continuing the tradition that our team has developed of not being able to use the players on the roster to the best of their ability.
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2011, 08:42 PM   #4
MTK
Hail Raiser
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,097
Re: Which Redskins Should Receive Contract Extensions after the Lockout

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
Three years in, we've refused to feature both in the same offense. If we're not going to hire an offensive mind that can do with two tight ends what all other teams are doing, and if it's going to be one player burying the other, then just move one now.

I think it's patently ridiculous that no offensive mind has figured out how to use two TEs at the same time to maximize the talent on our roster, but I just don't see it being any different this year.
They combined for 98 catches last year. Are there many better duos out there?
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2011, 12:05 AM   #5
tryfuhl
Gamebreaker
 
tryfuhl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 43
Posts: 12,514
Re: Which Redskins Should Receive Contract Extensions after the Lockout

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
They combined for 98 catches last year. Are there many better duos out there?
maybe we are not looking at this in the same manner, when your tight end is the second most targeted player on the team and your second tight end has just over half the catches as a backup running back and only 1 more than your fullback that's not exactly a duo to me
tryfuhl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2011, 09:17 AM   #6
MTK
Hail Raiser
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,097
Re: Which Redskins Should Receive Contract Extensions after the Lockout

Quote:
Originally Posted by tryfuhl View Post
maybe we are not looking at this in the same manner, when your tight end is the second most targeted player on the team and your second tight end has just over half the catches as a backup running back and only 1 more than your fullback that's not exactly a duo to me
Whatever you want to call it, I'm sure there aren't many teams out there that got more production last year from their TEs.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2011, 11:21 PM   #7
tryfuhl
Gamebreaker
 
tryfuhl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 43
Posts: 12,514
Re: Which Redskins Should Receive Contract Extensions after the Lockout

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
Whatever you want to call it, I'm sure there aren't many teams out there that got more production last year from their TEs.

You can say that for cooley vs most other te duos, doesn't mean that we're utilizing them properly or getting even near the most out of them, it's a waste of talent
tryfuhl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2011, 08:52 AM   #8
MTK
Hail Raiser
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,097
Re: Which Redskins Should Receive Contract Extensions after the Lockout

Quote:
Originally Posted by tryfuhl View Post
You can say that for cooley vs most other te duos, doesn't mean that we're utilizing them properly or getting even near the most out of them, it's a waste of talent
Probably just comes down to the coaches trust Cooley more. Davis is known to have some issues regarding work ethic and focus. So if we want to blame anyone blame Davis.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2011, 03:27 PM   #9
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
Re: Which Redskins Should Receive Contract Extensions after the Lockout

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
They combined for 98 catches last year. Are there many better duos out there?
The Redskins lead the league in passing attempts. Cooley had a bad year overall, but I think he set a career high in receptions (maybe yards too?). It is what it is.

I don't think any team in the NFL is as deep 1-3 as the Redskins at TE, except perhaps the Titans, and they don't really have a clear number one. And the 2 TE formations were clearly up from 2008-2009. Problem is, it's a running formation for this Redskins team. That's not such a bad thing, IMO, but you could do exactly what we currently do with Davis and Logan Paulsen as the top two TEs, and have no production dropoff. Davis just steps into Cooley's role as the focal point of the passing attack, and the no. 2 TE remains largely ignored and gets pulled on third downs.

Which is really the biggest point of all. We could trade one or the other and still have a really good TE situation. But we're missing the obvious opportunity to excel at the position because of some weird ratio of attempts we're trying to have between Cooley and Davis.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2011, 08:46 AM   #10
skinsfan69
Living Legend
 
skinsfan69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,643
Re: Which Redskins Should Receive Contract Extensions after the Lockout

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
Three years in, we've refused to feature both in the same offense. If we're not going to hire an offensive mind that can do with two tight ends what all other teams are doing, and if it's going to be one player burying the other, then just move one now.

I think it's patently ridiculous that no offensive mind has figured out how to use two TEs at the same time to maximize the talent on our roster, but I just don't see it being any different this year.
I don't know of any team that truly features two TE's. I can only think of NE that use a lot of 2 TE sets. It'd be nice to have them both on the field a little more, especially on 1st down. However in obvious passing situations, I'm not sure having both on the field would work.
skinsfan69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2011, 08:47 AM   #11
skinsfan69
Living Legend
 
skinsfan69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,643
Re: Which Redskins Should Receive Contract Extensions after the Lockout

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
I'd prefer to keep Cooley & Davis too. Seems that all we hear every offseason now is this silly trade Cooley talk. He's only 29 and still very productive, no reason why he can't keep playing at a high level for another 4-5 seasons. Keep them both, and find a way to get Davis more involved.
I agree. Gotta keep Cooley.
skinsfan69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.75916 seconds with 11 queries