Gibbs To Meet With Gardner Today

[formerskinzfan]

So now after passing up THE BEST WIDE RECEIVER IN THE ENTIRE DRAFT we will have to spend another year watching Rod Lardner drop balls and pout on the sidelines or watch him give us one decent year and then lose him to free agency with no compensation, leaving us with the EXTREMELY AVERAGE duo of David Patten and Santana Moss. Boy, that decision not to draft Mike Williams is already paying dividends.

[Redskins_P]

Originally Posted by formerskinzfan

So now after passing up THE BEST WIDE RECEIVER IN THE ENTIRE DRAFT we will have to spend another year watching Rod Lardner drop balls and pout on the sidelines or watch him give us one decent year and then lose him to free agency with no compensation, leaving us with the EXTREMELY AVERAGE duo of David Patten and Santana Moss. Boy, that decision not to draft Mike Williams is already paying dividends.

Dude, don't be so optimistic.

Before you judge anything, why don't you wait until the games are played. Thats when we find out how good our WR's are.

Paying dividends?

[RedskinsJunkie]

Originally Posted by Redskins_P

Dude, don't be so optimistic.

Before you judge anything, why don't you wait until the games are played. Thats when we find out how good our WR's are.

Paying dividends?

I understand you won't know until the play, but it would be good to be a little proactive instead of reactive. Don't get me wrong, I love Ramsey, but he ain't Brady whoever is comparing our WR corps to New England has to look at the entire ball of wax. They are playing a completely different offesive scheme then what Gibbs runs.

[Redskins_P]

Originally Posted by RedskinsJunkie

I understand you won't know until the play, but it would be good to be a little proactive instead of reactive. Don't get me wrong, I love Ramsey, but he ain't Brady whoever is comparing our WR corps to New England has to look at the entire ball of wax. They are playing a completely different offesive scheme then what Gibbs runs.

I don't think anyone is comparing our WR's to New Englands. What I did was point out that New England doesn't have a true #1 receiver, and look how successful they've been.

[skinsguy]

Originally Posted by formerskinzfan

So now after passing up THE BEST WIDE RECEIVER IN THE ENTIRE DRAFT we will have to spend another year watching Rod Lardner drop balls and pout on the sidelines or watch him give us one decent year and then lose him to free agency with no compensation, leaving us with the EXTREMELY AVERAGE duo of David Patten and Santana Moss. Boy, that decision not to draft Mike Williams is already paying dividends.

Really? How many catches did Williams make this year? Oh that's right...he didn't play!

How many catches has Williams made in the NFL? Oh that's right, he hasn't played in the NFL yet. So pointless to say some guy is the "best receiver" when they haven't proved a darn thing yet.

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by formerskinzfan

So now after passing up THE BEST WIDE RECEIVER IN THE ENTIRE DRAFT we will have to spend another year watching Rod Lardner drop balls and pout on the sidelines or watch him give us one decent year and then lose him to free agency with no compensation, leaving us with the EXTREMELY AVERAGE duo of David Patten and Santana Moss. Boy, that decision not to draft Mike Williams is already paying dividends.

I think Patten gets a bad rap because it seems to be the popular thing to say that Tom Brady has done so much with no wide receivers. But Patten, as part of a committe of receivers, has put up some pretty decent numbers and maybe he and the other Patriots' receivers should get some more recognition for what NE has accomplished these past few years.

As for Mike Williams being the BEST WIDE RECEIVER IN THE ENTIRE DRAFT, it's possible but interesting to note that he apparently wasn't considered good enough to be the first (or even second) WR taken in the draft

[RedskinsJunkie]

Originally Posted by TAFKAS

I think Patten gets a bad rap because it seems to be the popular thing to say that Tom Brady has done so much with no wide receivers. But Patten, as part of a committe of receivers, has put up some pretty decent numbers and maybe he and the other Patriots' receivers should get some more recognition for what NE has accomplished these past few years.

As for Mike Williams being the BEST WIDE RECEIVER IN THE ENTIRE DRAFT, it's possible but interesting to note that he apparently wasn't considered good enough to be the first (or even second) WR taken in the draft

M. Williams was by far more productive than either of the 2 receivers taken before him. No he didn't play last year, but the 2 years he played he had 30 TDs. 2 years. Braylon Edwards broke the Michigan record with 39 in 4 years. M. Williams dropped because of his combine times in the 40 and because he didn't play last year, but he will be better than both of those 2 wide outs. I am so glad that we did not move up to get Edwards. Also Williamson fit a need.

Also Kevin Dyson was chosen 5 slots ahead of Randy Moss... Is Dyson is WAY better than R. MOSS right???