![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
MVP
Join Date: May 2005
Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,460
|
Re: Report: Redskins Agree to Terms with Barry Cofield
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,380
|
Re: Report: Redskins Agree to Terms with Barry Cofield
Quote:
My personal preference is a mix of the two. Cofield can excel as a 3-4 DE, and while he may do well as a 3-4 NT, personally I think it'd be a bit of a waste. The discussion is first and foremost on how players fit into scheme, and some fans like me hoping that the team uses new acquisitions to the best of their ability. Let's look at the Ravens, Ngata is a beast and can play at any position along the d-line. But he's not their NT, they play him mostly at DE. They had Kelly Gregg as their NT, and then they drafted T. Cody to be their NT of the future. That to me is using your player to the best of their ability. The reason people will continue to bring Haynesworth is because they want to b*tch about him.
__________________
R.I.P. #21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | ||
|
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 14,864
|
Re: Report: Redskins Agree to Terms with Barry Cofield
Quote:
He played NT in college. He'll be fine at the NT spot. Giants didn't let Barry Cofield leave without a fight, agent says | NJ.com Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,380
|
Re: Report: Redskins Agree to Terms with Barry Cofield
Yes, but he is better suited to play DE, that's my whole point.
__________________
R.I.P. #21 |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|