Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Redskins Receivers Rotation

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-26-2011, 12:28 PM   #1
NC_Skins
Gamebreaker
 
NC_Skins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 14,755
Re: Redskins Receivers Rotation

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
Moss
Gaffney
Armstrong
Austin
Hankerson
Banks

Paul to the PS. Stallworth gets the axe (he doesn't play teams)

How do you still have Banks on that list seeing as how the KR/PR have been just as effective without him in there? I think there is too much potential on Paul to let go (not that he's shown us much yet) as compared to a 1 trick pony who's talents we've shown have been replaced in his absence.
__________________
"So let me get this straight. We have the event of the year on TV with millions watching around the world... and people want a punt, pass, and kick competition to be the halftime entertainment?? Folks, don't quit your day jobs."- Matty
NC_Skins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2011, 12:49 PM   #2
MTK
Hail Raiser
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,050
Re: Redskins Receivers Rotation

Quote:
Originally Posted by NC_Skins View Post
How do you still have Banks on that list seeing as how the KR/PR have been just as effective without him in there? I think there is too much potential on Paul to let go (not that he's shown us much yet) as compared to a 1 trick pony who's talents we've shown have been replaced in his absence.
If Banks is healthy he's too valuable in the return game. Austin is a nice backup as a returner, but Banks is still the big play guy. Austin doesn't match him in that regard.

Paul hasn't shown us much in the passing game. John Keim has remarked that his route running at this point is still really a work in progress.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2011, 12:52 PM   #3
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Redskins Receivers Rotation

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
Moss
Gaffney
Armstrong
Austin
Hankerson
Banks

Paul to the PS. Stallworth gets the axe (he doesn't play teams)
This makes the most sense at this point assuming Banks is healthy
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2011, 12:58 PM   #4
SFREDSKIN
Living Legend
 
SFREDSKIN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Pacifica, CA
Posts: 15,164
Re: Redskins Receivers Rotation

Moss
Gaffney
Armstrong
Austin
Hankerson
Paul
Banks- If healthy, keep him as a return specialist, carry 2 QB's to create a position for him. If not healthy and it would not surprise me if he is put on IR for the year.

I would love to keep all 7.
__________________
Joe Gibbs- The best coach of all time, Lombardi trophy should be renamed Gibbs.

Art Monk- Art was like an OL playing WR, doing the dirty work and not getting the glory.

Darrell Green- Best DB ever.


Purveyor of fine Filth
SFREDSKIN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2011, 12:59 PM   #5
freddyg12
Playmaker
 
freddyg12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,540
Re: Redskins Receivers Rotation

If Banks goes to IR (hope not), do they keep Stallworth as a 6th wr or go w/5?
freddyg12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2011, 01:11 PM   #6
saden1
MVP
 
saden1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 46
Posts: 10,069
Re: Redskins Receivers Rotation

Oh man, I love Austin. This guy is for real unlike our post scrub preseason wr heros. He just might be worthy of the #3 wr spot.
__________________
"The Redskins have always suffered from chronic organizational deformities under Snyder."

-Jenkins
saden1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2011, 01:24 PM   #7
saden1
MVP
 
saden1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 46
Posts: 10,069
Re: Redskins Receivers Rotation

#1 Moss
#2 Gaffney
#3 Armstrong
#4 Austin
#5 Stallworth
#6 Hankerson

Practice Squad:
Paul, Robinson

Banks is making the team as a Special Teamer much like our punter and kicker.
__________________
"The Redskins have always suffered from chronic organizational deformities under Snyder."

-Jenkins
saden1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2011, 02:12 PM   #8
That Guy
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 43
Posts: 17,620
Re: Redskins Receivers Rotation

Quote:
Originally Posted by saden1 View Post
#1 Moss
#2 Gaffney
#3 Armstrong
#4 Austin
#5 Stallworth
#6 Hankerson

Practice Squad:
Paul, Robinson

Banks is making the team as a Special Teamer much like our punter and kicker.
this seems to make the most sense, that's still a lot of "WR" spots though. I don't think they'd keep that many on the 53 AND 2 on the PS. i don't think robinson makes it.

daniels, sellers, and banks would be nice people to find a spot for. daniels in jarvis, banks in clemons spot, and sellers instead of the 9th OL or whatever since we don't have enough quality bodies yet to justify roster space.
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2011, 02:01 PM   #9
mooby
Hug Anne Spyder
 
mooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,596
Re: Redskins Receivers Rotation

I think at this point it will be

Moss
Gaffney
Armstrong
Austin
Hankerson
Banks

Paul and/or Robinson to the PS. Also once Paul is on the PS, can't he decline an offer to join another team? I've heard of that happening before, like last year with some rb on our practice squad who wanted to stay because of Shanny's system. Not saying it won't happen with Paul but you never know.
__________________
Hail to the Football Team
mooby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2011, 02:07 PM   #10
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Redskins Receivers Rotation

Quote:
Originally Posted by mooby View Post
I think at this point it will be

Moss
Gaffney
Armstrong
Austin
Hankerson
Banks

Paul and/or Robinson to the PS. Also once Paul is on the PS, can't he decline an offer to join another team? I've heard of that happening before, like last year with some rb on our practice squad who wanted to stay because of Shanny's system. Not saying it won't happen with Paul but you never know.
I believe you're thinking of James Davis who had the choice of joining our practice squad, and I believe Indy's, but chose ours in large part because of the system..which apparently kept him down and led to his release
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2011, 02:19 PM   #11
mooby
Hug Anne Spyder
 
mooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,596
Re: Redskins Receivers Rotation

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
I believe you're thinking of James Davis who had the choice of joining our practice squad, and I believe Indy's, but chose ours in large part because of the system..which apparently kept him down and led to his release
I believe you're right. Funny how that worked out. And technically he's not released yet, we still own his rights just in case he does decide to come back (which will probably lead to his release).
__________________
Hail to the Football Team
mooby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2011, 02:13 PM   #12
That Guy
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 43
Posts: 17,620
Re: Redskins Receivers Rotation

Quote:
Originally Posted by mooby View Post
I think at this point it will be

Moss
Gaffney
Armstrong
Austin
Hankerson
Banks

Paul and/or Robinson to the PS. Also once Paul is on the PS, can't he decline an offer to join another team? I've heard of that happening before, like last year with some rb on our practice squad who wanted to stay because of Shanny's system. Not saying it won't happen with Paul but you never know.
active roster pays 3-5x more than the practice squad, so...
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2011, 02:18 PM   #13
mooby
Hug Anne Spyder
 
mooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,596
Re: Redskins Receivers Rotation

Quote:
Originally Posted by That Guy View Post
active roster pays 3-5x more than the practice squad, so...
So maybe if he wants more money he joins an active roster elsewhere, but it's not uncommon for ps players to decline spots on other teams' rosters if they feel more comfortable with where they're at. Either way we'll see, I'm just happy that we have this problem to begin with.
__________________
Hail to the Football Team
mooby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2011, 02:21 PM   #14
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Redskins Receivers Rotation

I think he actually did finally get released
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2011, 02:29 PM   #15
mooby
Hug Anne Spyder
 
mooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,596
Re: Redskins Receivers Rotation

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
I think he actually did finally get released
Oh. Well then I guess I am mistaken.
__________________
Hail to the Football Team
mooby is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.93833 seconds with 11 queries