Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Receivers

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-02-2005, 10:35 AM   #1
Defensewins
Playmaker
 
Defensewins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 3,767
Re: Receivers

Quote:
Originally Posted by RedskinsJunkie
Again, New England and SanFran run the WC system and we run bubble screens and counter treys still. My point is the point that you made. Brady and that system spreads the ball around. Our system is not designed like that and therefore you can not compare our WR to the Patriots WR.
Gibbs system runs more than bubble screens and counter treys. I think RT Jansen's injury and not having an adequate replacement forced Gibbs to use the Max protection more than he wanted to. I still think it was out of need more than desire.
Look at the 1992 Skins, Gibbs threw the ball alot. The Skins were in 3 WR sets all the time and Sanders, Monk and Clark were running more than bubble screens. Gibbs came from the air-Coryell school of offense. When he was at San Diego they threw the ball more than anyone.
I don't care what offense you run, the responsiblity of spreading the ball around goes to the QB. If your #1 and #2 options are covered, throw it to #3 and #4.
Plays breakdown all the time, if an eligible receiver is open throw him the ball.
That is not exclusive to the WC system.
Defensewins is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.48662 seconds with 11 queries