![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,052
|
Re: 2011 Playoff Projections
Quote:
Oh, and Tripp deserves some props about the Raidah's receivers.
__________________
Analysis using datasets (aka stats) is an attempt at reverse-engineering a player's "goodness". Virtuosity remembered, douchebaggery forgotten. The ideal character profile shoved down modern Western men and women's throats is Don Juan. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 14,755
|
Re: 2011 Playoff Projections
__________________
"So let me get this straight. We have the event of the year on TV with millions watching around the world... and people want a punt, pass, and kick competition to be the halftime entertainment?? Folks, don't quit your day jobs."- Matty |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 754
|
Re: 2011 Playoff Projections
nfc
eagles giants cowboys saints 49ers packers afc patriots colts chargers steelers jets texans I probably shoulda have taken strength of schedule into account....meh |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 14,755
|
Re: 2011 Playoff Projections
scratch that, you did pick the 49ers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Queens, NYC
Age: 56
Posts: 3,803
|
Re: 2011 Playoff Projections
Sorry to put this on this thread but you need to watch the NFL channel and see Steve Mariucci speak about the Redskins/MS/BA plan good stuff.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: 2011 Playoff Projections
I'm going with my system until I see the preseason. I can usually improve on these projections by adding bits and pieces of information I pick up from the preseason.
AFC: 1. Steelers 2. Colts 3. Patriots 4. Chargers 5. Ravens 6. Texans NFC: 1. Saints 2. Packers 3. Eagles 4. Cardinals 5. Giants 6. Cowboys Good news for the Redskins here, if they can get to third place, it might be good enough for a totally not deserved playoff spot. It's going to be tough to stay out of the cellar this year, but 9-7 in this division probably does it.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Warpath Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UNITED STATES
Age: 39
Posts: 36,242
|
Re: 2011 Playoff Projections
Afc
1. Pats 2. Steelers 3. Colts 4. Chargers 5. Jets 6. Broncos nfc. 1. Packers 2. Saints 3. Eagles 4. Cards 5. Falcons 6. Bears
__________________
“Mediocre people don’t like high achievers, and high achievers don’t like mediocre people.” ― Nick Saban |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: 2011 Playoff Projections
God the Raiders are just totally loaded at the wide receiver position. I'm almost certain they're going to find a way to make the playoffs. There's just no spot for them in my projections: the Chargers win the West, the Ravens and the Steelers play fictitiously easy schedules this year (as do the far less talented Browns), and the system really likes the Texans defense (seriously). So that's six playoff teams right there. I just think the Raiders are loaded.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,592
|
Re: 2011 Playoff Projections
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: 2011 Playoff Projections
I was being serious. If you throw DHB out of the equation, it's Jacoby Ford, Chaz Schilens, Louis Murphy and they've got Denarius Moore as well. Sure, that's not the Packers level of dominant, but who is? The big thing for the Raiders, re: loaded is that everyone is 25 or younger.
They also are loaded in the front seven, but that's more well known, I believe. Their OL projection is holding them back. They might not be able to block anyone all year.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: 2011 Playoff Projections
Quote:
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Naega jeil jal naga
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 40
Posts: 14,750
|
Re: 2011 Playoff Projections
Nah thats me and Quake or Quake and me or wait Quake and I.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice." - Scooter "I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now." - FRPLG |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
You did WHAT?!?
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna.
Age: 37
Posts: 14,189
|
Re: 2011 Playoff Projections
Bag of Quake, Quaker-Bag, Dirt-Quake, Dirt cheap, Quaker Instant Oatmeal. Yeah I'm done.
__________________
https://open.spotify.com/artist/1NG9zNxqMP8cYNP72QqUQT Shameless self-promotion. It is what it is. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Naega jeil jal naga
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 40
Posts: 14,750
|
Re: 2011 Playoff Projections
See we would be coming up with plans to run Vegas but we spend to much time on crap like this.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice." - Scooter "I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now." - FRPLG |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: 2011 Playoff Projections
Ha. Not exactly, but we run Oakland like Pitt and Jonah Hill.
I still think the Texans are going to screw it up in the end. Sixteen games is a long time for Gary Kubiak and Wade Phillips to not make a franchise killing decision. They just look really good on paper in September, better than they ever have before, perhaps. But the Jets look weaker than I've seen them in awhile, and that opens up a pretty big spot in the AFC for a surprise team to grab. Weakest AFC schedules: Steelers, Ravens, Raiders, Chargers, Browns.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|